Energy Meter Magnet Tampering Detection Using 3D Sensor Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing energy meter tampering detection methods are inefficient and costly, particularly in addressing AC magnetic field tampering, and often fail to differentiate between AC and DC magnetic fields, leading to false alarms or missed tamper events.

Innovation Solution

A cost-effective system using a 3D magnetic sensor and a classifier to detect and classify magnet tampering conditions in energy meters, distinguishing between AC, DC, and stray magnetic fields by calculating average, minimum, and maximum magnetic field strengths and applying appropriate thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If Rogowski coils are used to shield current sensors, then immunity to magnetic fields is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic field immunityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical shielding mechanisms (Rogowski coils, metallic plates) with an electronic/software-based solution. A magnetic sensor detects magnetic field conditions, and a classifier algorithm processes the sensor data to identify tampering events. This substitution of mechanical/physical protection with electronic detection and classification resolves the contradiction by achieving magnetic field immunity without adding complex shielding hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If multiple linear Hall sensors are used to detect AC magnetic fields, then detection accuracy is improved, but system cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic field detection accuracyVSAvoidnumber of sensors
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a single 3D magnetic sensor that performs multiple functions: detecting both AC and DC magnetic fields, determining magnetic field strength, and providing data for tampering classification. The classifier algorithm processes this single sensor's output to identify different tampering conditions. This multi-functional approach achieves high detection accuracy without requiring multiple separate sensors, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and quantity of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If a single magnetic sensor with classification is used, then device cost is reduced, but ability to detect both AC and DC magnetic fields may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem costVSAvoiddetection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a 3D magnetic sensor that measures magnetic field vectors in three dimensions (X, Y, Z axes). The classifier algorithm analyzes these multi-dimensional parameters along with temporal variations to distinguish between AC and DC magnetic fields. By changing from scalar to vector measurement and using sophisticated parameter analysis, the system achieves comprehensive detection capability with a single sensor, resolving the contradiction between cost and versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If Hall effect sensors are used with fixed magnetic thresholds, then DC magnet detection is improved, but AC magnet detection efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDC magnet detectionVSAvoidAC magnet detection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces fixed magnetic thresholds with dynamic, adaptive thresholding through the classifier algorithm. The classifier continuously analyzes magnetic field characteristics including strength, direction, and temporal variations to adaptively determine tampering conditions. This dynamic approach allows the system to effectively detect both DC magnets (which produce steady fields) and AC magnets (which produce time-varying fields), resolving the contradiction between DC detection precision and AC detection efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively detects and classifies magnet tampering events, reducing false alarms and improving detection accuracy while maintaining cost-effectiveness, thus enhancing the reliability of energy meter measurements.

Implementation Method 1

a magnetic sensor that measures a magnetic field in at least one of a plurality of directions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field sensing: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP4124870B1Classification of magnet tampering conditions on a metering device
Publication Date: 2025.02.12 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP4124870B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4124870B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4124870B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A method and system for detecting magnetic tampering on an energy meter (10) can involve, in a first phase: gathering magnetic field sample data, an average magnetic field strength, a minimum magnetic field strength, and a maximum magnetic field strength from a magnetic field condition applied to an energy meter (10) by a magnetic sensor (18) that measures a magnetic field in one or more directions, and using learning coefficients obtained with an artificial neural network and calculated from the magnetic field sample data and the average magnetic field strength, the minimum magnetic field strength, and the maximum magnetic field strength to classify with a classifier, magnet tampering conditions with respect to the energy meter (10). In a second phase, a magnet tamper event can be identified with respect to the energy meter (10) when the magnet tampering condition classified by the classifier is greater than a magnetic detection threshold.