Electricity Meter Self-Verification Using Test Current Injection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Smart electricity meters face challenges in accurately evaluating the accuracy of their measurement devices over time, leading to potential overestimation or underestimation of energy consumption, which is difficult to assess without operator intervention.

Innovation Solution

An automated evaluation method within the electricity meter that detects stability periods, injects a test current, and compares measurements to assess accuracy, allowing for reliable verification without human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If operator intervention is used to verify measurement accuracy, then measurement accuracy can be verified, but it is expensive and inconveniences the customer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidcustomer convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The electricity meter performs self-diagnosis by automatically injecting test currents and comparing measurement results with expected values, enabling the device to verify its own measurement accuracy without external operator intervention. This self-service approach eliminates the need for expensive manual verification while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement accuracy verification is performed periodically by injecting test currents at predetermined intervals and comparing results with pre-calculated expected values. This periodic automated checking ensures continuous accuracy verification without requiring continuous operator presence or customer intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Measurement precision

If operator intervention is used to verify measurement accuracy, then measurement accuracy can be verified, but it increases costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidverification cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The automated self-verification system eliminates the need for paid operator interventions by performing accuracy checks internally using built-in test current injection capabilities and pre-stored expected value tables, significantly reducing verification costs while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Expected measurement values are pre-calculated and stored in the meter's memory before actual measurements occur. During verification, the meter simply compares real-time measurements against these pre-prepared reference values, enabling rapid automated verification without requiring expensive external calibration equipment or expert operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If sensors drift over time, then measurement accuracy degrades, but detecting this drift is complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoidevaluation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors measurement results by comparing actual measurements with expected values derived from known test current injections. When discrepancies exceed predetermined thresholds, the system identifies sensor drift and can trigger alerts or automatic compensation, providing continuous feedback on measurement reliability without complex external monitoring equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11988698B2Verifying the accuracy of measurements taken by an electricity meter
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 SAGEMCOM ENERGY & TELECOM SAS
  • US11988698B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of evaluating the accuracy of an electricity meter, the method comprising: a preliminary stage comprising a step of acquiring first measurements of a first electrical magnitude, and a step of detecting a period of stability; a test stage comprising a step of injecting a test current into a conductor of the electricity meter, and a step of acquiring at least one second measurement of the first electrical magnitude; an evaluation stage comprising a step of comparing the second measurement of the first electrical magnitude with the sum of a first stability value representative of the first electrical magnitude during the period of stability plus a predefined value corresponding to the expected increase in the first electrical magnitude due to injecting the test current, and a step of evaluating the accuracy of the meter from said comparison.