Metering Unit Operability Check via Pressure Drop Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

It is technically difficult to check the operability of metering units, such as injection nozzles, installed in hard-to-reach locations in a motor vehicle engine compartment, as they cannot be easily removed or accessed for inspection.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that utilize a second metering unit to send control signals and measure the quantity of operating medium dispensed, pressure drop, and pumping cycles, allowing for the comparison with the first metering unit to determine operability without physically removing the first metering unit, thereby simplifying the checking process and identifying potential faults.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the first metering unit is installed at a location in the engine compartment where it can be removed and checked for operability, then the ease of checking the metering unit is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional checking equipment and procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of checking metering unitVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The metering system performs self-diagnosis by using the second metering unit to test the first metering unit's operability. The control unit automatically sends control signals, detects operating parameters, and compares results without requiring external checking equipment or manual removal of the metering unit, thereby simplifying the checking process while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The second metering unit acts as an intermediary testing device within the system. By using the second metering unit to introduce operating medium and measure pressure drops, the system can indirectly assess the first metering unit's performance without physically accessing or removing it from its installed location

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the first metering unit is installed at a hard-to-reach location in the engine compartment, then the adaptability of the installation location is improved, but the ease of checking the metering unit deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation location flexibilityVSAvoidease of checking metering unit
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-diagnosis where the metering units test each other's operability through automated control signals and parameter detection. This eliminates the need for physical access to hard-to-reach locations, allowing the first metering unit to be checked remotely through the second metering unit's testing capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The second metering unit serves as an intermediary that can access and test the first metering unit remotely. By introducing operating medium through the second metering unit and measuring pressure changes, the system can assess the first metering unit's status without requiring physical removal or direct access to its installed location

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If the quantity of operating medium dispensed by the second metering unit is detected and compared with the specified quantity, then the measurement precision of the metering unit is improved, but the loss of time increases due to additional checking steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetering precisionVSAvoidchecking time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The metering system performs automated self-testing where the control unit automatically sends control signals to the second metering unit, detects the actual quantity dispensed, compares it with the specified quantity, and determines operability. This automated process eliminates manual checking steps and reduces time loss while maintaining high measurement precision through electronic detection and comparison

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where the control unit continuously monitors the actual quantity of operating medium dispensed by the second metering unit, compares it with the target value, and provides real-time information to determine operability. This feedback loop enables precise measurement while minimizing checking time through automated, real-time comparison

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the technical simplicity of checking metering unit operability, allowing for the identification of faults and potential issues without removing the first metering unit, facilitating maintenance and ensuring correct operation by comparing pressure drops and pumping cycles between units.

Implementation Method 1

a pump (not shown) for supplying the operating medium to the metering units

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

a first metering unit (20) for introducing an operating medium into a line (40, 50) and/or into a combustion chamber of an engine (60)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid dispensing: Injector

Data Source

PatentUS12049837B2Method for checking operability, checking device and motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.07.30 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US12049837B2 patent drawing
  • US12049837B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for checking operability of a first metering unit includes sending a control signal to a second metering unit to dispense a second quantity; comparing the quantity dispensed with the second quantity; sending a control signal to a second metering unit to introduce a third quantity; detecting the pressure drop caused by the introduction of the third quantity; sending a control signal to the first metering unit to introduce a first quantity; detecting the pressure drop caused by executing the control signal to introduce the first quantity; and ascertaining that the first metering unit is not functioning correctly if a difference between the pressure drop detected as a result of the execution of the control signal to introduce the first quantity and the pressure drop detected as a result of the execution of the control signal to introduce the third quantity is above a threshold.