Methane Dehydrocyclization Catalyst for Syngas and Aromatics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing processes for converting methane to aromatic hydrocarbons face challenges such as high energy costs, low selectivity to aromatics, and the economic burden of hydrogen utilization and carbon dioxide separation, especially in natural gas streams with high CO2 content, limiting their commercial viability.

Innovation Solution

A process involving dehydrocyclization of methane over a catalyst to produce aromatic hydrocarbons and syngas, followed by reacting residual methane and hydrogen with an oxygen-containing species to enhance the H2:CO ratio, allowing for the co-production of syngas with a desirable composition and recycling of residual methane.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional processes convert methane to aromatic hydrocarbons, then aromatic production is achieved, but energy costs increase and selectivity to aromatics decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselectivity to aromaticsVSAvoidenergy costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines dehydrocyclization and steam reforming reactions into a single integrated process. The dehydrocyclization reactor simultaneously produces aromatic hydrocarbons and syngas through coupled reactions, eliminating the need for separate conversion steps and reducing overall energy consumption while improving aromatic selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs specific operating parameters including temperature range of 700-900°C, pressure of 1-10 atm, and steam-to-methane ratio of 0.5-2.0 to optimize the dehydrocyclization process. These parameter changes enable simultaneous achievement of high aromatic selectivity and energy efficiency by controlling reaction pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If natural gas streams with high CO2 content are processed, then feedstock utilization is improved, but separation costs and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveutilization of high CO2-containing natural gasVSAvoidseparation steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of CO2 (which would require separation) into a beneficial byproduct. The steam reforming reactions utilize CO2 to produce additional syngas, transforming a separation burden into a valuable product stream that can be used for chemicals or fuel synthesis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The dehydrocyclization catalyst system is designed to handle feeds with varying CO2 content (0-50 mol%) without requiring pre-separation. The catalyst maintains activity and selectivity across a wide range of feed compositions, enabling universal processing of different natural gas streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If dehydrocyclization is used to convert methane to aromatics, then aromatic ring concentration increases, but hydrogen utilization becomes more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearomatic ring concentrationVSAvoidhydrogen utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the dehydrocyclization reaction (which produces H2) with steam reforming (which consumes H2 to produce syngas). This integration allows in-situ utilization of the hydrogen produced during aromatic formation, converting it into valuable syngas for downstream applications and eliminating hydrogen disposal challenges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of manufacture

If existing methane conversion processes are implemented, then aromatic hydrocarbons are produced, but the economic viability decreases due to additional separation and hydrogen management costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeconomic viabilityVSAvoidseparation and hydrogen management
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple functions (aromatic production, syngas generation, hydrogen utilization) into a single dehydrocyclization process. This consolidation eliminates separate separation units and hydrogen management systems, reducing capital investment and operating costs while improving economic viability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The process is designed to be self-sufficient by utilizing the hydrogen produced during dehydrocyclization internally for steam reforming. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external hydrogen management infrastructure and reduces overall process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process effectively increases the aromatic ring concentration and H2:CO ratio in the syngas, improving the economic viability by reducing the need for additional separation steps and enabling the utilization of high CO2-containing natural gas fields.

Implementation Method 1

dehydrocyclization of methane over a catalyst to produce aromatic hydrocarbons and syngas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

reacting residual methane and hydrogen with an oxygen-containing species to enhance the H2:CO ratio

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS7772450B2Production of aromatic hydrocarbons and syngas from methane
Publication Date: 2010.08.10 EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC
  • US7772450B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a process for converting methane to syngas and aromatic hydrocarbons, a feed containing methane is contacted with a dehydrocyclization catalyst under conditions effective to convert said methane to aromatic hydrocarbons and produce a first effluent comprising aromatic hydrocarbons and H2, wherein said first effluent comprises at least 5 wt % more aromatic hydrocarbons than said feed. At least part of the H2 from said first effluent is then reacted with an oxygen-containing species, such as carbon dioxide, to produce a second effluent having an increased H2 and CO content compared with said first effluent.