Methane Oxidative Coupling Process with Integrated Cracking Zone

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) processes face challenges in achieving high ethylene selectivity and efficiency due to excess heat leading to catalyst deactivation and unwanted deep oxidation products, while also requiring high energy input for syngas production.

Innovation Solution

A process involving an oxidative coupling of methane reaction in a first reaction zone followed by a cracking and hydrogenation reaction in a second reaction zone without a catalyst, where ethane is cracked to produce additional ethylene and carbon dioxide is hydrogenated to carbon monoxide, with recycling of ethane and carbon dioxide streams to enhance ethylene production and reduce energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If OCM reaction is conducted with catalyst to activate methane C-H bonds, then methane conversion to ethylene is achieved, but excess heat causes catalyst deactivation and deep oxidation to CO and CO2

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveethylene productionVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction process is divided into two distinct zones: a first reaction zone containing the OCM catalyst for methane activation and ethylene production, and a second reaction zone without catalyst for ethane cracking and CO2 hydrogenation. This segmentation allows the catalyst to operate in a controlled environment while managing heat effects separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A diluent gas (steam, CO2, or N2) is introduced as an intermediary substance to absorb excess heat from the exothermic OCM reaction, preventing catalyst overheating and deactivation. The diluent acts as a heat sink that maintains catalyst stability while allowing the reaction to proceed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If excess oxygen is provided to promote methane oxidation, then methane conversion increases, but selectivity to ethylene decreases due to deep oxidation to CO and CO2

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethane conversionVSAvoidethylene selectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The oxidation process is segmented into two stages: partial oxidation in the first reaction zone to produce ethylene, and subsequent cracking/hydrogenation in the second reaction zone. This allows controlled oxygen consumption while managing selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The oxygen concentration and temperature parameters are optimized in the first reaction zone to achieve partial oxidation with high ethylene selectivity. In the second reaction zone, different parameters (higher temperature, no catalyst) promote cracking and hydrogenation reactions that convert remaining oxygen-containing compounds to desired products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If high temperature is applied to break C-H bonds in methane, then reaction rate increases, but energy input increases and catalyst deactivation accelerates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction rateVSAvoidenergy input
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The exothermic heat generated from the OCM reaction in the first zone is utilized to drive the endothermic cracking and hydrogenation reactions in the second zone. This self-service approach allows the system to use its own generated heat to sustain subsequent reactions, reducing external energy input requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The process utilizes phase transitions and temperature gradients between the two reaction zones. The first zone operates at temperatures optimized for catalytic oxidation, while the second zone uses the heat from the first zone to achieve the high temperatures needed for cracking and hydrogenation without additional external heating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

4Manufacturing precision

If traditional gas separation processes are used to separate ethylene from product mixture, then ethylene can be recovered, but energy consumption and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveethylene separationVSAvoidseparation energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The second reaction zone performs preliminary chemical transformations (cracking of ethane to ethylene, hydrogenation of CO2 to CO) before the separation step. This preliminary action increases ethylene concentration in the product mixture, making subsequent separation easier and more energy-efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The product mixture composition is modified through controlled chemical reactions in the second zone, changing the parameters (concentration, temperature) to favor ethylene production and facilitate easier separation with reduced energy input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach increases ethylene production, reduces carbon dioxide emissions, and improves the hydrogen to carbon monoxide molar ratio in syngas, leading to more efficient production of ethylene and syngas with reduced energy input and enhanced catalyst stability.

Implementation Method 1

reacting, via an oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) reaction, a first reactant mixture in a first reaction zone to produce a first product mixture, wherein the first reaction zone comprises an OCM catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

at least a portion of ethane of the second reactant mixture undergoes a cracking reaction to produce ethylene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCracking: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

at least a portion of the carbon dioxide of the second reactant mixture undergoes a hydrogenation reaction to carbon monoxide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Data Source

PatentUS11148985B2Process for oxidative conversion of methane to ethylene
Publication Date: 2021.10.19 SABIC GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES BV
  • US11148985B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for producing ethylene and syngas comprising reacting, via OCM, first reactant mixture (CH4&O2) in first reaction zone comprising OCM catalyst to produce first product mixture comprising ethylene, ethane, hydrogen, CO2, CO, and unreacted methane; introducing second reactant mixture comprising first product mixture to second reaction zone excluding catalyst to produce second product mixture comprising ethylene, ethane, hydrogen, CO, CO2, and unreacted methane, wherein a common reactor comprises both the first and second reaction zones, wherein ethane of second reactant mixture undergoes cracking to ethylene, wherein CO2 of second reactant mixture undergoes hydrogenation to CO, and wherein an amount of ethylene in the second product mixture is greater than in the first product mixture; recovering methane stream, ethane stream, CO2 stream, ethylene stream, and syngas stream (CO&H2) from the second product mixture; and recycling the ethane stream and the carbon dioxide stream to second reaction zone.