Aromatics Production from Methanol and Pyrolysis Oil Co-Feeds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for converting methanol to aromatics have low yields, requiring large equipment and leading to side reactions, with a desire for improved methods that produce higher yields of paraxylene for industrial use.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using an oxygenate feed with an effective hydrogen index of 1.4 to 1.9, exposed to an aromatization catalyst under specific conditions, and staging the introduction of pyrolysis oil in multiple reactor locations to minimize coking and fouling, utilizing a molecular sieve such as ZSM-5 with a Group 8-14 element as the catalyst.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional methods using molecular sieve catalysts are used for converting methanol to aromatics, then the reaction can proceed, but the yield of aromatics is relatively low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearomatics yieldVSAvoidreactant loss to side reactions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the catalyst by changing physical-chemical parameters - specifically introducing a metal component (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, or Ga) into the zeolite structure to create a bifunctional catalyst system. This parameter change enables the catalyst to simultaneously promote aromatic formation while suppressing side reactions, thereby improving aromatics yield and reducing reactant loss without changing the basic reaction pathway

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite catalyst materials combining metal components with zeolite molecular sieve structures. The composite nature of these catalysts (metal particles within or on the zeolite matrix) allows synergistic effects where the metal sites promote dehydrogenation and the zeolite structure provides shape-selective catalysis, resulting in higher aromatics yield with reduced side reactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If conventional methanol conversion methods are used, then aromatics can be produced, but large equipment footprints are required relative to total product volume

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearomatics production efficiencyVSAvoidequipment footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By modifying the catalyst parameters to create a bifunctional system with metal components and zeolite, the reaction efficiency is enhanced. This improves the conversion rate and aromatics yield per unit volume of catalyst and reactor, thereby reducing the equipment footprint required for a given production capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The composite catalyst structure combines the high activity of metal sites with the shape-selective properties of zeolite, creating a more efficient catalytic system. This increased catalytic efficiency allows for smaller reactor volumes to achieve the same production output, directly reducing the equipment footprint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If pyrolysis oil is introduced into the reaction system, then aromatics yield can be improved, but coking and fouling of the reactor increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearomatics yieldVSAvoidreactor fouling
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces pyrolysis oil at specific locations within the reactor rather than uniformly throughout. By controlling the local concentration and timing of pyrolysis oil introduction, the system maximizes aromatics formation benefits while minimizing coking and fouling in critical reactor zones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The feed introduction is segmented into multiple stages and locations rather than a single bulk addition. This segmentation allows the system to process pyrolysis oil in controlled portions, improving aromatics yield while distributing the harmful coking effect across multiple reaction zones and time periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly increases the yield of aromatics, particularly paraxylene, while reducing reactor fouling and equipment requirements, by optimizing the hydrogen index of the oxygenate feed and strategically introducing pyrolysis oil, resulting in improved aromatics production efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

exposed to an aromatization catalyst under effective conversion conditions to form a conversion effluent comprising one or more aromatic compounds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

Conventional methods for converting methanol to aromatics can involve exposing a methanol-containing feed to a molecular sieve, such as ZSM-5

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShape-selective catalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS9809505B1Production of aromatics from methanol and co-feeds
Publication Date: 2017.11.07 EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC
  • US9809505B1 patent drawing
  • US9809505B1 patent drawing
  • US9809505B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods are provided for improving the yield of aromatics during conversion of oxygenate feeds. An oxygenate feed can contain a mixture of oxygenate compounds, including one or more compounds with a hydrogen index of less than 2, so that an effective hydrogen index of the mixture of oxygenates is between about 1.4 and 1.9. Methods are also provided for converting a mixture of oxygenates with an effective hydrogen index greater than about 1 with a pyrolysis oil co-feed. The difficulties in co-processing a pyrolysis oil can be reduced or minimized by staging the introduction of pyrolysis oil into a reaction system. This can allow varying mixtures of pyrolysis oil and methanol, or another oxygenate feed, to be introduced into a reaction system at various feed entry points.