Method and system for production optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for optimizing liquefied natural gas (LNG) production in LNG plants fail to effectively consider multiple variables concurrently, leading to inadequate or delayed responses to changes in process variables and ambient conditions, resulting in suboptimal production.

Innovation Solution

An advanced process control system (APC) with a solution vector and production optimization (RTPO) system that adjusts manipulated variables based on dependencies indicated by models, predicting and analyzing correlations between control and manipulated variables to optimize LNG production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional control methods are used to optimize LNG production, then the control system is simple and easy to operate, but the system cannot effectively consider multiple variables concurrently, leading to inadequate or delayed responses to changes in process variables and ambient conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLNG production optimizationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple functional modules: an Advanced Process Control (APC) module that handles real-time control decisions, a Real Time Optimization (RTO) module that performs production optimization, and a machine learning module that captures variable correlations. Each module operates with specific responsibilities, allowing the complex system to be managed through divided functionality while achieving comprehensive multi-variable optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A gain matrix serves as an intermediary data structure that captures and quantifies the relationships between manipulated variables and control variables. This matrix acts as a mediator that translates complex process dynamics into actionable control signals, enabling the system to respond effectively to multiple variables simultaneously without requiring direct complex modeling of all interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional control methods are used, then the control system is simple, but the response to changes in process variables and ambient conditions is inadequate or delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse adequacyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating gain matrices that capture the relationships between variables before control decisions are needed. The APC and RTO modules pre-process data and establish control strategies in advance, enabling the system to respond rapidly to changes without delayed computation. This preliminary preparation ensures adequate response to process variations and ambient conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system implements continuous feedback loops where the APC module receives real-time process data, compares actual values with target values, and adjusts manipulated variables accordingly. The RTO module provides higher-level feedback by optimizing production targets based on changing conditions. This multi-layered feedback mechanism ensures adequate and timely response to process variable changes while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If multiple variables are considered concurrently for optimization, then production efficiency improves, but the control system complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple functional modules: an Advanced Process Control (APC) module that handles real-time control decisions, a Real Time Optimization (RTO) module that performs production optimization, and a machine learning module that captures variable correlations. Each module operates with specific responsibilities, allowing the complex system to be managed through divided functionality while achieving comprehensive multi-variable optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms complex multi-variable optimization into a series of parameter adjustments using gain matrices. By changing the representation of variable relationships into standardized gain parameters, the system can efficiently handle multiple variables concurrently. The APC and RTO modules adjust these parameters in real-time based on process conditions, enabling production efficiency improvement without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If a comprehensive optimization system is implemented to consider multiple variables, then production optimization improves, but the system requires sophisticated modeling and data analysis capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction optimizationVSAvoidmodeling and analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A gain matrix serves as an intermediary data structure that captures and quantifies the relationships between manipulated variables and control variables. This matrix acts as a mediator that translates complex process dynamics into actionable control signals, enabling the system to respond effectively to multiple variables simultaneously without requiring direct complex modeling of all interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical control approaches with data-driven modeling and machine learning techniques. Instead of relying on complex physical models of process dynamics, the system uses statistical correlations captured from historical data through the gain matrix. This substitution of data analytics for mechanical modeling simplifies the overall system architecture while maintaining comprehensive optimization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12460861B2Method and system for production optimization
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 SHELL USA INC
  • US12460861B2 patent drawing
  • US12460861B2 patent drawing
  • US12460861B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure provides a method and system for optimizing production of a natural gas liquefaction process, the method comprising the steps of: selecting at least one manipulated variable (MV) for controlling the liquefaction process; selecting at least one control variable (CV), the at least one control variable at least comprising liquefied natural gas (LNG) throughput; providing at least one model, each model providing a dependency of the at least one control variable (CV) on the at least one manipulated variable (MV); using the at least one model to estimate LNG throughput for at least one of the manipulated variables (MV); obtaining process data from the liquefaction process, the process data at least including observed values of LNG throughput; creating a gain matrix based on said interdependencies; and using the gain matrix to optimize a process control system of the liquefaction process.