Method for liquid-vapor contacting in a mass transfer column using multiple pass, parallel flow downcomer trays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mass transfer columns face limitations in high-capacity vapor-liquid contacting, particularly in high-pressure distillation systems, where the efficiency of mass transfer is hindered by inadequate liquid handling capacity and flow configuration, leading to issues like flooding and reduced mass transfer efficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A multiple pass downcomer tray design featuring an annular tray with multiple mass transfer decks, central and peripheral downcomers, liquid channel structures, weirs, and bubble forming structures, which promotes a serpentine liquid flow path and parallel flow arrangement across successive trays, enhancing liquid-vapor interaction and mass transfer efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional single pass or two pass trays are used, then the tray structure is simple, but the liquid handling capacity is insufficient and flooding occurs at high liquid rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid handling capacityVSAvoidtray structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tray is divided into multiple pass sections (typically 3-5 passes) with multiple downcomers distributed across the tray width. Liquid is distributed into multiple streams that flow in opposite directions across adjacent passes, increasing liquid handling capacity while maintaining manageable flow rates per downcomer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from single-direction liquid flow to multi-directional flow patterns by implementing opposite flow directions in adjacent passes. This dimensional change in flow configuration allows parallel liquid streams to coexist without interfering with each other, significantly increasing overall liquid capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If liquid flow rate is increased to handle high-capacity distillation, then productivity improves, but mass transfer efficiency decreases due to inadequate liquid-vapor contact time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistillation capacityVSAvoidmass transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The multiple pass configuration ensures continuous liquid flow across the entire tray surface through multiple sequential passes. Liquid that does not immediately contact vapor in one pass continues to flow through subsequent passes, ensuring complete utilization of vapor-liquid contact opportunities and maintaining high mass transfer efficiency at increased flow rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

By segmenting the liquid flow into multiple passes with opposite directions in adjacent passes, the invention creates multiple independent mass transfer zones. This segmentation allows high overall liquid capacity while maintaining adequate contact time in each localized zone, preventing the efficiency loss that would occur with a single high-velocity flow path

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Quantity of substance

If downcomer area is increased to handle higher liquid rates, then liquid capacity improves, but the active area for vapor-liquid contact is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid discharge capacityVSAvoidactive tray area
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The total downcomer capacity is segmented into multiple smaller downcomers distributed across the tray. This segmentation allows the liquid handling capacity to be distributed across multiple locations, reducing the area required by each individual downcomer while maintaining the total liquid discharge capacity needed for high-capacity operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multiple downcomers serve dual functions: they collectively provide the total liquid discharge capacity needed for high liquid rates, and their distributed configuration minimizes the total area occupied by downcomers compared to a single large downcomer, thereby preserving maximum active tray area for vapor-liquid contact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If parallel flow arrangement is implemented across successive trays, then mass transfer efficiency improves due to uniform driving forces, but the tray configuration becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass transfer efficiencyVSAvoidflow configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements parallel flow arrangement by inverting the flow direction in adjacent passes - while liquid flows in one direction in one pass, it flows in the opposite direction in the adjacent pass. This inversion creates parallel flow patterns across successive trays, ensuring uniform mass transfer driving forces throughout the column while using a systematic design approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design significantly improves mass transfer efficiency by optimizing liquid flow paths, reducing weir loading, and maintaining uniform driving forces across the column, thereby enhancing the overall performance of high-capacity vapor-liquid contacting operations.

Implementation Method 1

vapor bubbling through the apertures in the tray deck

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBubbling: Bubble

Implementation Method 2

The vapor and liquid interaction on the tray desirably causes a froth to build up on the tray

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFroth formation: Foam

Implementation Method 3

Downcomers are conventionally provided in combination with the vapor-liquid contacting trays to provide a passage through which liquid is discharged from one tray to an underlying tray

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity flow: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS10458703B2Method for liquid-vapor contacting in a mass transfer column using multiple pass, parallel flow downcomer trays
Publication Date: 2019.10.29 PRAXAIR TECH INC
  • US10458703B2 patent drawing
  • US10458703B2 patent drawing
  • US10458703B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multiple pass, parallel flow downcomer tray for a mass transfer column and method for liquid-vapor contacting in a mass transfer column is provided. The multiple pass, parallel flow downcomer tray has at least four mass transfer decks configured to provide contact between an ascending vapor passing upward through apertures on the tray surface and a traversing liquid on the tray surface. The tray further includes a central downcomers disposed near a central axis of the tray and two or more peripheral downcomers disposed near the edge of the tray and spaced apart from the central axis, wherein at least two of the four mass transfer decks are configured to discharge the traversing liquid into the peripheral downcomers and two of the four mass transfer decks are configured to discharge the traversing liquid into the central downcomer.