Methyl Methacrylate Production via Liquid-Phase Oxidative Esterification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing methyl methacrylate via oxidative esterification face challenges such as catalyst attrition, reduced space-time yield, and difficulty in separating byproducts, particularly due to the use of slurry catalysts and larger catalyst particles, which affect selectivity and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the production of ethylene from ethanol, followed by conversion to propionaldehyde, methacrolein, and then methyl methacrylate using a heterogeneous noble metal-containing catalyst in a reactor system with specific conditions, including pressures above 1 bar and controlled ratios of methanol to methacrolein, to enhance selectivity and reduce byproduct formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If slurry catalysts of less than 200 μm size are used, then the reaction activity is improved, but catalyst attrition increases and filtration becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction activityVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state parameter of the catalyst from slurry (small particles <200 μm) to fixed bed (large particles >200 μm), and changes the reaction phase from gas phase to liquid phase. This parameter transformation allows using larger catalyst particles that resist attrition while maintaining high reaction activity through optimized liquid-phase reaction conditions and catalyst composition (Pd-Pb-Sn system with specific weight ratios).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions the reaction from gas phase to liquid phase, which enables the use of fixed bed reactors with larger catalyst particles. The liquid phase allows better contact between reactants and catalyst surface, compensating for the reduced surface area from using larger particles, while eliminating catalyst attrition issues associated with slurry systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

2Reliability

If larger catalyst particles are used in fixed bed reactors, then catalyst attrition is reduced, but space-time yield decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst stabilityVSAvoidspace-time yield
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite catalyst system with Pd-Pb-Sn metals supported on a carrier, where Pb and Sn components enhance the activity and stability of Pd. This composite structure allows using larger particles (200-5000 μm) in fixed bed configuration while maintaining high catalytic activity through synergistic effects of the metal components, achieving both attrition resistance and high space-time yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes multiple parameters including liquid-phase reaction conditions, temperature (60-150°C), pressure (1-30 atm), and catalyst composition (Pd: 0.1-10 wt%, Pb: 0.1-10 wt%, Sn: 0.1-10 wt%) to compensate for the reduced surface area of larger fixed bed catalyst particles, thereby maintaining high space-time yield while using attrition-resistant large particles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If methanol is provided in excess to maximize methacrolein conversion, then conversion efficiency is improved, but separation complexity increases due to large product stream volume

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiencyVSAvoidseparation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the methanol-to-methacrolein molar ratio to a specific range (2:1 to 10:1) rather than using large excess, and combines this with optimized reaction conditions (liquid phase, temperature 60-150°C, pressure 1-30 atm, catalyst composition) to achieve high conversion efficiency with moderate methanol excess, thereby reducing the volume of recycle stream and simplifying separation requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the selectivity and reduces the formation of byproducts like methyl isobutyrate, leading to a more efficient production of methyl methacrylate with increased space-time yield and better separation characteristics.

Implementation Method 1

producing methyl methacrylate in an oxidative esterification reaction from the methacrolein produced in step c) with methanol in the presence of a heterogeneous noble metal-containing catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

the conversion of an aldehyde and alcohol in the presence of oxygen to a carboxylic ester via oxidative esterification

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS20240400493A1Process for methyl methacrylate production from ethanol
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 ROHM & HAAS CO
  • US20240400493A1 patent drawing
  • US20240400493A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for producing methyl methacrylate is disclosed, the method comprising: a) producing ethylene from ethanol; b) producing propionaldehyde from the ethylene produced in step a); c) producing methacrolein from propionaldehyde produced in step b) and formaldehyde; and d) producing methyl methacrylate in an oxidative esterification reaction from the methacrolein produced in step c) with methanol. Step c) is performed at a pressure above 1 bar. Step d) is performed in a reactor system in a liquid phase reaction in the presence of a heterogeneous noble metal-containing catalyst, wherein the reactor system comprises an oxygen-containing gas. An average concentration of methacrolein in step d) is less than 40 wt % based on the total weight of methanol and methacrolein. The reactor system of step d) has an average ratio of methanol to methacrolein less than 20:1 based on an average amount of methanol and methacrolein entering and exiting the system.