2-Methyl THF Extraction of Levulinic Acid From Acidic Brine

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current processes for extracting levulinic acid and formic acid from biomass conversion byproducts face challenges such as low yield, high capital costs, and reactor fouling due to high temperature conditions, making them commercially unviable.

Innovation Solution

A process using 2-methyl tetrahydrofuran as a solvent for liquid-liquid extraction under ambient conditions to separate levulinic acid and formic acid from calcium chloride brine solutions, employing countercurrent extraction in separation columns followed by distillation to achieve high recovery and purity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If high temperature reaction conditions are used for levulinic acid production, then reaction rate is improved, but reactor fouling increases and yield decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction rateVSAvoidreactor fouling
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the temperature parameter from high temperature to ambient temperature conditions. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by maintaining adequate reaction rate through alternative means (ambient conditions with appropriate catalysts) while eliminating the harmful fouling effects associated with high temperature operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces thermal energy input (high temperature) with chemical catalysis to drive the reaction. This substitution allows the reaction to proceed at ambient temperature, eliminating reactor fouling while maintaining reaction rate through catalytic activity rather than thermal energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Speed

If high temperature reaction conditions are used for levulinic acid production, then reaction rate is improved, but yield decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction rateVSAvoidyield
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the temperature parameter from high to ambient, and simultaneously optimizes other parameters such as catalyst selection and reaction time. This multi-parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by achieving adequate reaction rates through catalysis while improving yield through milder, more selective reaction conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention substitutes thermal driving force with catalytic driving force. This substitution enables the reaction to proceed at ambient temperature with improved selectivity and yield, while catalytic activity maintains the necessary reaction rate without the detrimental effects of high temperature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If specialized equipment to withstand hydrolysis conditions is used, then reaction reliability is improved, but capital cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction reliabilityVSAvoidcapital cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the operating temperature parameter from high to ambient conditions. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by eliminating the need for specialized high-temperature equipment, thereby reducing capital costs while maintaining reaction reliability through optimized catalytic processes and ambient-condition-appropriate materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If current separation processes are used for levulinic acid, then separation capability is improved, but yield decreases and capital cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation capabilityVSAvoidyield
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the extraction parameters by using 2-methyl THF as the solvent and operating at ambient temperature. This resolves the contradiction by achieving effective separation through optimized solvent selection and extraction conditions, thereby improving yield while avoiding the high capital costs associated with conventional high-temperature separation equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves high recovery rates of 70-99.5% for levulinic acid and efficient separation of formic acid, reducing capital costs and preventing reactor fouling, thus enhancing commercial viability.

Implementation Method 1

A process using 2-methyl tetrahydrofuran as a solvent for liquid-liquid extraction under ambient conditions to separate levulinic acid and formic acid from calcium chloride brine solutions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid-liquid extraction: Liquid-Liquid Extraction

Implementation Method 2

employing countercurrent extraction in separation columns followed by distillation to achieve high recovery and purity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Data Source

PatentUS20260035331A1Methods for extracting levulinic acid using 2-methyl tetrahydrofuran
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 ORIGIN MATERIALS OPERATING INC
  • US20260035331A1 patent drawing
  • US20260035331A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Levulinic acid and formic acid are valuable chemical intermediaries present in byproducts of some biomass conversion processes. Described herein are commercially viable processes for extracting levulinic acid and formic acid at high recovery. Under the present approach, levulinic acid and formic acid may be extracted from an aqueous reactor product, such as an acidic brine (e.g., calcium chloride brine) feed from a biomass hydrolysis reaction. If present, mineral acid catalysts may be recovered. Embodiments use solvents such as, e.g., 2-methyl tetrahydrofuran, for extracting levulinic acid and formic acid from the aqueous solution.