Optical Metrology Recipe Optimization for Semiconductor Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current optical metrology techniques face challenges in accurately measuring complex, high-aspect ratio, three-dimensional semiconductor structures with opaque materials due to limited penetration of optical radiation and increased parameter correlation, leading to longer measurement times and reduced measurement precision.

Innovation Solution

The method involves optimizing measurement recipes by reducing the set of measurement technologies and machine parameters using process variation and spectral sensitivity information to create a constrained measurement model, allowing for faster and more precise characterization of structural and material characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple measurement technologies and large ranges of machine parameters are used to measure complex semiconductor structures, then measurement coverage and characterization capability are improved, but measurement time and computation time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement coverageVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the measurement process by dividing complex structures into multiple measurement zones and using different measurement technologies for different zones. This allows selective measurement of critical areas without measuring the entire structure, reducing overall measurement time while maintaining coverage of important features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing measurements at selected machine parameters rather than scanning the entire parameter range. By identifying critical parameter regions that provide sufficient measurement information, the system achieves adequate characterization with reduced measurement time and computational load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Adaptability or versatility

If measurements are performed over large ranges of machine parameters, then measurement coverage is improved, but illumination intensity at any particular wavelength decreases and signal uncertainty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement coverageVSAvoidsignal uncertainty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating measurement resources at specific machine parameters where the structure exhibits maximum sensitivity. Instead of uniform measurement across all parameters, the system identifies and focuses on local regions in parameter space that provide the most information, thereby improving signal quality and reducing uncertainty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs measurements at selected machine parameters rather than scanning the entire parameter range. By identifying critical parameter regions that provide sufficient measurement information, the system achieves adequate characterization with reduced signal uncertainty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple measurement technologies are used simultaneously, then characterization capability is improved, but device complexity and measurement time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharacterization capabilityVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the measurement task by assigning different measurement technologies to different measurement zones or parameter ranges. This allows the system to use multiple technologies without requiring all to operate simultaneously, reducing system complexity while maintaining comprehensive characterization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent selectively applies measurement technologies based on the specific measurement requirements. Not all technologies are used for every measurement, but only those necessary for the particular structure and parameters being measured, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If optical radiation is used to measure high-aspect ratio, three-dimensional structures, then non-destructive measurement is achieved, but penetration to bottom layers becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-destructive measurementVSAvoidpenetration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent measures structures from multiple dimensional perspectives by varying angles of incidence and using multiple measurement zones. Instead of attempting to penetrate deeply through high-aspect ratio structures in a single direction, the system accesses different layers and regions by changing the measurement geometry, enabling comprehensive characterization without requiring deep penetration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10354929B2Measurement recipe optimization based on spectral sensitivity and process variation
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 KLA CORP
  • US10354929B2 patent drawing
  • US10354929B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optimized measurement recipe is determined by reducing the set of measurement technologies and ranges of machine parameters required to achieve a satisfactory measurement result. The reduction in the set of measurement technologies and ranges of machine parameters is based on available process variation information and spectral sensitivity information associated with an initial measurement model. The process variation information and spectral sensitivity information are used to determine a second measurement model having fewer floating parameters and less correlation among parameters. Subsequent measurement analysis is performed using the second, constrained model and a set of measurement data corresponding to a reduced set of measurement technologies and ranges of machine parameters. The results of the subsequent measurement analysis are compared with reference measurement results to determine if a difference between the estimated parameter values and the parameter values derived from the reference measurement is within a predetermined threshold.