Mass Flow Controller Proportional-Integral Control Loop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mass flow controllers (MFCs) face challenges in accurately responding to step changes in setpoint without experiencing flow rate overshoot, due to variations across different fluid types and pressures.

Innovation Solution

A digital signal control system with a proportional signal modifier and an integral signal modifier in series, combined with a valve adjustment mechanism, is used to prevent overshoot by integrating error and proportional signals to control the mass flow rate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If a standard proportional-integral control loop is used, then the MFC can respond to setpoint changes, but flow rate overshoot occurs due to variations in fluid type and pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speed to setpoint changesVSAvoidflow rate accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the proportional gain factor based on operating conditions (fluid type, pressure, flow rate range). The gain factor is modified in real-time to compensate for variations in system characteristics, allowing the controller to maintain optimal performance across different operating points without causing overshoot

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the proportional gain parameter adaptively rather than using a fixed value. The gain factor is adjusted as a function of operating conditions to optimize the control response. This parameter modification allows the system to achieve both fast response and accurate flow rate control by tailoring the control strength to current operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If the proportional gain is increased to improve response time, then the MFC responds faster to setpoint changes, but overshoot of the new flow rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidflow rate stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The proportional gain factor is made dynamic rather than fixed. It adjusts automatically based on operating conditions such as fluid type, pressure, and flow rate range. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to use higher gain values when appropriate for fast response while using lower gain values when stability is paramount, eliminating the need to choose between speed and stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention modifies the proportional gain parameter adaptively to optimize control performance. By changing the gain factor according to operating conditions, the system achieves both rapid response to setpoint changes and stable flow rate control, preventing overshoot while maintaining fast response times

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If the proportional gain is decreased to reduce overshoot, then flow rate stability improves, but the response time to setpoint changes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate stabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The proportional gain factor dynamically adapts to operating conditions, allowing the system to achieve both stability and fast response. Rather than being constrained to use low gain for stability, the dynamic gain adjustment enables the system to use appropriately high gain values when operating conditions permit, maintaining both stability and responsiveness simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If a fixed control algorithm is used, then the control system is simple, but performance varies greatly among different fluid types and pressures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidperformance consistency across conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control algorithm modifies the proportional gain parameter based on operating conditions (fluid type, pressure, flow rate range). This parameter adaptation allows a relatively simple control structure to achieve consistent performance across diverse operating conditions. The gain factor adjustment is implemented through lookup tables or calculation formulas that add minimal complexity while significantly improving adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8195312B2Multi-mode control loop with improved performance for mass flow controller
Publication Date: 2012.06.05 PROTERIAL LTD
  • US8195312B2 patent drawing
  • US8195312B2 patent drawing
  • US8195312B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment of the invention comprises a mass flow controller comprising a digital controller, a valve, and a sensor. The digital controller is adapted to implement a control loop having a proportional signal modifier in series with an integral signal modifier. The integral signal modifier is adapted to receive a combination signal and output an integrated signal. The valve is adapted to receive the integrated signal and adjust a valve opening in accordance with the integrated signal. The sensor is adapted to output a measured flow rate signal indicative of an actual fluid flow rate in the mass flow controller. The measured flow rate signal is received by the proportional signal modifier and used in conjunction with a setpoint signal to determine the error signal.