Mass Flow Controller Thermal Sensor Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mass flow controllers (MFCs) face challenges in accurately validating the operation of thermal sensors, leading to potential drift and malfunction, which can result in inaccurate flow rate control and maintenance issues.

Innovation Solution

A thermal sensor validation system comprising a thermal mass flow sensor, a pressure mass flow sensor, and a digital controller that produces and processes signals to calculate mass flow rates, compares them to validate sensor operation, and adjusts the control valve to maintain set points, using a combination of thermal and pressure signals to ensure accurate flow control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a thermal sensor is used to measure mass flow rate, then the measurement can be performed, but the sensor may drift and malfunction leading to inaccurate control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass flow rate measurement accuracyVSAvoidthermal sensor operation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback by continuously monitoring the thermal sensor output and comparing it against expected values based on control valve position and process conditions. When drift or malfunction is detected through this feedback mechanism, the system can identify and respond to the degradation in sensor performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary validation process that acts as a mediator between the thermal sensor and the control system. This validation mechanism uses multiple parameters (control valve position, process conditions, expected flow characteristics) to indirectly assess sensor health without requiring direct sensor replacement or recalibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If only a thermal sensor is used for flow control, then the system is simpler, but validation of sensor operation becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor system complexityVSAvoidsensor operation validation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-validation by using its own operational parameters (control valve position, process conditions) to assess the health of the thermal sensor. The MFC essentially validates its own sensor operation using information already available in the control loop, eliminating the need for separate validation hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is designed with multi-functionality, serving both the primary function of flow control and the secondary function of sensor validation. The same digital controller that manages the control valve also performs sensor validation by analyzing the relationship between control actions and thermal sensor responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If thermal sensor drift is not detected, then the system operates continuously, but inaccurate flow rate control results in maintenance issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operation capabilityVSAvoidflow control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation checks continuously during normal operation to detect sensor drift before it causes significant control inaccuracies. By monitoring sensor health in advance, the system can identify degradation trends and take corrective action before maintenance issues arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively validates thermal sensor operation, detects drift, and ensures accurate mass flow rate control by comparing thermal and pressure sensor readings, preventing malfunctions and maintaining precise flow rate settings.

Implementation Method 1

a thermal mass flow sensor adapted to produce a first signal, the first signal varying linearly or nonlinearly with a temperature differential between a pair of thermal mass flow sensor sensing elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature differential measurement:

Implementation Method 2

a pressure mass flow sensor adapted to produce a second signal, the second signal varying linearly or nonlinearly with an upstream and downstream pressure of a main flow line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential measurement:

Implementation Method 3

a thermal mass flow sensor adapted to produce a first signal, the first signal varying linearly or nonlinearly with a temperature differential between a pair of thermal mass flow sensor sensing elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS7826986B2Method and system for operating a mass flow controller
Publication Date: 2010.11.02 PROTERIAL LTD
  • US7826986B2 patent drawing
  • US7826986B2 patent drawing
  • US7826986B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for operating a mass flow controller is described. One embodiment validates the operation of a mass flow controller thermal sensor, including detecting zero drift and span drift in the sensor by comparing the thermal sensor output to a pressure sensor output. In one embodiment, each sensor provides a signal to a digital controller or other processing unit and the controller calculates the mass flow rates of a gas flowing through the unit as measured by the sensors. The mass flow rates may then be compared to determine if one of the thermal sensor is operating properly.