Mass Flow Controller Zero-Trending Diagnostics for Self-Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mass flow controllers (MFCs) in industrial processes often become de-tuned due to installation, maintenance, and operational wear, leading to complex and costly diagnostic and calibration challenges, with limited self-diagnostic capabilities and high maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

An advanced diagnostics system that monitors select variables, generates notifications for issues, and re-tunes MFCs based on modified tuning variables, capable of shutting down the MFC if reverse flow rates become undesirable, designed in software or a combination of hardware and software.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If advanced diagnostics system is implemented, then diagnostic capability and operational efficiency are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The MFC performs self-diagnosis by monitoring its own operational parameters (set point adjustments, reverse flow rates, temperature differentials) and automatically detecting de-tuning conditions without requiring external diagnostic equipment or expert intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors operational parameters and provides feedback about the MFC's health status, enabling early detection of de-tuning and triggering appropriate maintenance actions before performance degradation occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If MFC becomes de-tuned due to wear and installation, then measurement precision deteriorates, but maintenance cost and downtime increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow measurement accuracyVSAvoidmaintenance downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of de-tuning conditions by monitoring operational parameters before they cause significant measurement errors, allowing maintenance to be scheduled at convenient times rather than waiting for failures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical diagnostic procedures with electronic/software-based monitoring of operational parameters, enabling remote diagnostics and reducing the need for physical intervention during maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If limited self-diagnostic capabilities are provided, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation and maintenance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic system complexityVSAvoidmaintenance ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit performs multiple functions including normal MFC operation, self-diagnosis, parameter monitoring, and maintenance scheduling within a single integrated system, eliminating the need for separate diagnostic equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses software/firmware as an intermediary layer between the hardware components and the user, providing intelligent interpretation of operational parameters and translating complex diagnostic data into actionable maintenance recommendations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3871059B1Mass flow controller with advanced zero trending diagnostics
Publication Date: 2023.12.06 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • EP3871059B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3871059B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3871059B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A diagnostics system, for mass flow controller calibration, comprising a controller communicable coupled to a sensor(s) and a valve. The controller controls the valve based on a predetermined set point value and communication from the at least one sensor. The controller determines a number of set point value adjustments and compares results of a calibration operation and a set point value plus a tolerance value. The controller generates a notification message indicating at least one of the predetermined number of set point value adjustments and results of the comparing. The controller calibrates the mass flow controller based on, at least in part, one of a predetermined number of set point value adjustments, results of the comparison, and user input. The notification message can comprise temperature values, valve drive values, sensor flow rate values, gas flow hours, and a remaining number of set point adjustments based on a total fluid hours.