Predictive Maintenance for Multi-Function Device Image Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current defect detection algorithms in multi-function devices (MFDs) can detect defects in scanned images but cannot predict when defects will occur or automatically execute maintenance routines to prevent them, thereby compromising image quality.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that uses machine learning to track the machine state of an MFD, predict potential defects based on associated defect classes, and execute maintenance routines to prevent these defects by determining the appropriate maintenance action when a machine state exceeds a probability threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If defect detection algorithms are used to detect defects in reproduced images, then defects can be identified compared to original images, but the system cannot predict when defects will occur or automatically execute maintenance routines

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidimage quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by tracking machine state parameters and predicting potential defects before they actually occur. When the probability of a defect exceeds a threshold, maintenance routines are automatically executed in advance to prevent the defect from manifesting in reproduced images, thus maintaining consistent image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring machine state parameters, comparing them against learned patterns from historical defect data, and automatically triggering maintenance routines when defect probability exceeds thresholds. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables predictive maintenance that prevents defects before they affect image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If manual maintenance routines are performed based on scheduled intervals, then device components are maintained regularly, but defects may still occur between maintenance cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance simplicityVSAvoiddefect prevention capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically monitoring its own machine state, predicting potential defects using machine learning models, and triggering maintenance routines without human intervention. This autonomous self-monitoring and self-maintenance capability allows the system to prevent defects proactively rather than relying on manual scheduled maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary maintenance actions by predicting defects before they occur and automatically executing maintenance routines in advance. This predictive approach ensures components are maintained before degradation leads to defects, eliminating the gap between scheduled maintenance intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If maintenance routines are executed frequently to prevent defects, then image quality is maintained, but device productivity and operational time are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality consistencyVSAvoiddevice operational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts maintenance frequency based on actual machine state parameters and predicted defect probabilities rather than using fixed schedules. Maintenance routines are executed only when the probability of a defect exceeds a predetermined threshold, optimizing the balance between image quality maintenance and device productivity by avoiding unnecessary maintenance interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If defect detection is performed on every reproduced image, then all defects are identified, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection completenessVSAvoidimage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary defect prediction by analyzing machine state parameters before image reproduction using machine learning models. This preliminary assessment identifies high-risk scenarios where defects are likely to occur, allowing the system to focus detailed defect detection resources only on images produced under problematic conditions rather than analyzing every image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11483435B2Machine state and defect detection meta data to execute maintenance routines on a multi-function device
Publication Date: 2022.10.25 XEROX CORP
  • US11483435B2 patent drawing
  • US11483435B2 patent drawing
  • US11483435B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is disclosed. For example, the method executed by a processor of a multi-function device (MFD) includes tracking a machine state of the MFD, predicting a potential defect based on a determination that the machine state is associated with a defect class of a plurality of different defect classes, determining a maintenance routine associated with the defect class, and executing the maintenance routine to prevent the potential defect.