Multi-function Device Emergency Shutdown via Gateway Access Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current solutions for managing office devices during emergencies are cumbersome and lack an end-to-end detection mechanism, leading to security issues and inefficient power consumption, as administrators struggle to manually disable multiple devices across an organization during evacuation situations.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize sensors to detect emergencies and automatically disable multi-function devices by checking the status of access to an organization gateway, enabling remote control and minimizing manual intervention, ensuring devices are paused during emergencies and resumed when safe.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If administrators manually trigger devices to OFF/standby state during emergencies, then device security is improved, but the complexity and time required to manage multiple devices increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice securityVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables devices to automatically detect emergency conditions through integrated sensors and autonomously transition to standby or offline states without requiring administrator intervention. Each device monitors emergency signals and self-manages its operational state based on detected conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple device management functions into a unified automated system that simultaneously monitors emergency conditions and controls multiple devices. This integration consolidates what would otherwise require separate manual actions for each device into a single automated response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If administrators manually manage multiple MFDs during emergencies, then device control is achieved, but the time required for evacuation and device management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice controlVSAvoidevacuation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary configuration by establishing automated emergency response protocols before emergencies occur. Sensors are pre-positioned and device communication channels are pre-established, enabling immediate automated response when emergencies are detected without requiring real-time administrative decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of manual device control with an automated electronic control system. Sensors detect emergency conditions and automatically send control signals to devices, substituting the need for physical administrator presence and manual device manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If printers capture emergency alarms, then emergency detection is improved, but false alarms and misinterpretation of alarms increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency detectionVSAvoidalarm accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where devices verify alarm conditions through multiple sensors and cross-check signals before triggering emergency responses. This feedback loop helps distinguish genuine emergencies from false alarms by requiring corroborating evidence from different detection sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification layer between alarm detection and device response. Instead of direct alarm-to-device triggering, the system uses intermediate validation processes that assess alarm authenticity before initiating emergency protocols, reducing false positive responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If MFDs are left unattended during emergencies, then device availability is maintained, but power consumption increases and security risks arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice availabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts device operational states based on real-time emergency conditions. Devices transition from active to standby or offline states automatically, allowing the system to adapt power consumption levels to match the actual emergency situation while maintaining the capability to resume operations when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11128780B1Methods and systems for managing one or more office devices during an emergency in an organization
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 XEROX CORP
  • US11128780B1 patent drawing
  • US11128780B1 patent drawing
  • US11128780B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure discloses methods and systems for managing one or more multi-function devices during an emergency in an organization. The method includes receiving one or more emergency signals from one or more sensors installed within the organization. Based on the one or more emergency signals, status of access to an organization gateway is checked to ascertain the occurrence of emergency. Based on the ascertainment, the one or more multi-function devices are automatically disabled.