Magnetic Flux Leakage Pipeline Analysis System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for analyzing magnetic flux leakage (MFL) data in pipelines lack a systemic approach, failing to effectively combine intelligent technologies for comprehensive data analysis, leading to difficulties in forming a practical and feasible data analysis system with generality and transplantability.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent analysis system is developed, comprising a complete data set building module, discovery module, and solution module, utilizing time-domain-like sparse sampling, KNN-softmax, convolutional neural networks, Lagrange multiplication framework, and random forests to reconstruct data, detect defects, and evaluate pipeline conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional MFL data analysis methods are used, then local point detection can be performed, but systematic data analysis capability is lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection precisionVSAvoidsystematic analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The analysis system is divided into four functional modules: complete data set building module, discovery module, quantization module, and solution module. Each module handles specific tasks in the data analysis pipeline, from data preprocessing to defect evaluation, enabling systematic analysis while maintaining manageable complexity through functional decomposition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system integrates multiple analysis methods including KNN-softmax for classification, CNN for feature extraction, random forest for quantization, and ASME B31G for evaluation into a unified platform. This multi-functional integration allows the system to handle various defect types and analysis requirements through a single comprehensive framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If intelligent technologies are integrated, then comprehensive data analysis capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata analysis adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem structural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects and applies different intelligent algorithms based on the specific analysis task. The complete data set building module uses KNN-softmax when classification is needed, switches to CNN for feature extraction from complex patterns, and employs random forest for quantization tasks, allowing adaptive complexity management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The discovery module acts as an intermediary between raw MFL data and final defect evaluation. It preprocesses data, identifies potential defects using multiple algorithms, and prepares standardized output for the quantization module, thereby managing complexity through layered abstraction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If multiple intelligent algorithms are combined, then analysis accuracy is improved, but implementation difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection reliabilityVSAvoidsystem implementation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Each intelligent algorithm is implemented as a separate functional module with dedicated input and output interfaces. The complete data set building module, discovery module, quantization module, and solution module can be independently developed, tested, and maintained, reducing implementation difficulty while maintaining high reliability through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the solution module evaluates defect severity using ASME B31G and feeds results back to the discovery module for further analysis if needed. This iterative feedback loop improves reliability by allowing multiple passes through the analysis pipeline with different algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If conservative maintenance decisions are made, then pipeline safety is ensured, but maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipeline safetyVSAvoidmaintenance cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the decision-making parameter from conservative threshold-based approaches to probability-based assessments using KNN-softmax classification and random forest quantization. By providing probabilistic defect severity evaluations rather than binary pass/fail decisions, the system enables optimized maintenance scheduling that ensures safety while reducing unnecessary maintenance costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11488010B2Intelligent analysis system using magnetic flux leakage data in pipeline inner inspection
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 NORTHEASTERN UNIV CHINA
  • US11488010B2 patent drawing
  • US11488010B2 patent drawing
  • US11488010B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an intelligent analysis system for inner detecting magnetic flux leakage (MFL) data in pipelines, including a complete data set building module, a discovery module, a quantization module and a solution module, wherein: a complete data set building method is adopted in the complete data set building module to obtain a complete magnetic flux leakage data set; a pipeline connecting component discovery method is adopted in the discovery module to obtain the precise position of a weld; an anomaly candidate region search and identification method is adopted in the discovery model to find out magnetic flux leakage signals with defects; a defect quantization method based on a random forest is adopted in the quantization module to obtain a defect size; and a pipeline solution based on an improved ASME B31G standard is adopted in the solution module to output an evaluation result.