Pressurized Micellized Nicotine Inhaler

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vaping devices fail to provide a safer aerosolized delivery system that can deliver a continuous amount of micellized liquid nicotine formula, leading to high nicotine inhalation levels and associated health risks.

Innovation Solution

An aerosol pressurized inhalation delivery device that eliminates the need for cartridges, heating elements, and batteries, using a metal canister pressurized with a propellant like Zephex®152a to deliver a micellized liquid nicotine formula through a continuous valve and actuator, allowing for variable nicotine dosage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional vaping devices use heating elements and batteries to vaporize nicotine solution, then nicotine delivery is achieved, but device complexity increases and reliability decreases due to electronic circuitry malfunctions and battery failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the heating element and battery from the vaping device, extracting the problematic electronic components that cause malfunctions and failures. The device replaces these with a purely mechanical actuator system that opens a valve to allow pressurized propellant and nicotine solution to be expelled, eliminating electronic circuitry entirely and thereby improving reliability while reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the electro-thermal vaporization system (heating element + battery) with a mechanical pressurized aerosol delivery system. The actuator mechanically opens a valve that allows propellant and nicotine solution to mix and expel as aerosol, substituting electronic/thermal mechanisms with a purely mechanical system that is more reliable and less complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If e-cigarette cartridges contain nicotine solution with propylene glycerin base, then nicotine delivery is achieved, but harmful factors increase due to secondhand smoke exposure and potential leaking

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical-chemical parameters of the nicotine delivery system by using a pressurized aerosol formulation with surfactants that create micelles. This allows nicotine to be delivered in a controlled aerosol state rather than as vapor from heated liquid, reducing the formation of harmful combustion byproducts and secondhand smoke while maintaining effective nicotine delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of nicotine solution leaking into a benefit by using a pressurized sealed canister system with a valve mechanism. The pressurization ensures the nicotine solution remains contained until intentional actuation, and any potential leakage is prevented by the pressure differential that keeps the solution sealed until the valve is deliberately opened.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Adaptability or versatility

If variable nicotine dosage is required, then adaptability improves, but device complexity increases due to need for precise dosage control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements variable dosage capability through a dynamic actuation system where the user can press the actuator for different durations. Short presses deliver smaller amounts of aerosol while longer presses deliver larger amounts, allowing variable nicotine dosage without complex electronic controls or multiple cartridges. The simplicity of the mechanical valve system maintains low device complexity while achieving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device reduces nicotine inhalation by up to 80% while maintaining the pleasurable experience, eliminates secondhand smoke, and reduces the risk of device malfunctions and harmful exposures.

Implementation Method 1

aerosol pressurized inhalation delivery device having an actuator, continuous valve, receptacle housing and metal canister containing a micellized liquid nicotine formula and propellant such as Zephex®152a that when combined makes the micellized liquid nicotine formula and propellant homogeneous, allowing the micellized liquid nicotine formula to be expelled as an aerosol

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas expansion: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

micellized liquid nicotine formula and propellant such as Zephex®152a that when combined makes the micellized liquid nicotine formula and propellant homogeneous

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMicellization: Microemulsion

Data Source

PatentUS12262756B2Methods for delivering a micellized liquid formula to an individual
Publication Date: 2025.04.01
  • US12262756B2 patent drawing
  • US12262756B2 patent drawing
  • US12262756B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention improves and enhances the delivery of one of an aerosolized micellized formula by use of an aerosol pressurized inhalation delivery device. The device may include one or more replaceable or reusable components, including but not limited to a canister and an actuator. Methods for using the device to deliver a continuous dosage via the delivery device are also described herein.