Micro-Beam Intimate Apparel Hanger for Low-Material Rigidity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing intimate apparel hangers suffer from material inefficiency, structural instability, and deformation under load, leading to increased manufacturing and transportation costs, reduced product lifespan, and unsatisfactory garment presentation.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight intimate apparel hanger design featuring a hanger beam with a wider and shorter configuration, incorporating composite garment retaining clips and a reinforced hook structure, which reduces material usage while enhancing structural stability and mechanical strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If traditional intimate apparel hanger design is used, then structural stability is maintained, but material consumption increases and manufacturing costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial consumptionVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the hanger beam by reducing its length and increasing its thickness, creating a shorter and thicker beam configuration. This parameter transformation allows the hanger to maintain structural stability while using less material, directly resolving the contradiction between material consumption and structural strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material construction with reinforced beams that combine multiple material properties to achieve high strength-to-weight ratio. The use of reinforced plastics and composite structures enables reduced material usage while preserving mechanical strength and structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If traditional hanger beam configuration is used, then manufacturing experience is maintained, but deformation occurs under load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidhanger beam configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the hanger beam parameters by reducing length and increasing thickness, creating a compact configuration that resists deformation under load. This geometric transformation directly addresses the deformation issue while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through updated design parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If heavier hanger design is used, then structural strength is improved, but transportation costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidhanger weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces hanger weight by decreasing beam length and optimizing cross-sectional dimensions. The shorter and thicker beam configuration achieves comparable or superior strength with reduced mass, directly resolving the contradiction between mechanical strength and weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The use of reinforced plastics and composite materials provides high strength-to-weight ratio, enabling the hanger to maintain mechanical strength while significantly reducing weight for cost-effective transportation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If more material is used in hanger construction, then structural integrity is maintained, but environmental sustainability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces material consumption through optimized geometric parameters, creating a shorter and thicker beam that uses less plastic material while maintaining structural integrity. This reduction directly decreases environmental impact through lower resource consumption and waste generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The use of reinforced plastics and composite structures achieves high structural integrity with minimized material usage, reducing the environmental footprint through efficient resource utilization and decreased manufacturing waste

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS8302826B2Micro-beam intimate apparel hanger
Publication Date: 2012.11.06 PROSPERITY PROD HK LTD
  • US8302826B2 patent drawing
  • US8302826B2 patent drawing
  • US8302826B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a lightweight intimate apparel hanger, the hanger body has a first arm extending from a hook of the hanger to a first end of the body and a second arm extending from the hook to a second end of the body. The first arm and the second arm body each have an upper flange, a lower flange and a middle web connecting the upper flange and the lower flange. The first arm has a height H defined as from the upper flange to the lower flange and a width W defined as the width of the upper flange and the lower flange, the ratio of the width W to the height H (W/H) larger than 1. The hanger can has a top sizer attaching means for attaching a top sizer or a lower neck sizer attaching means for attaching a lower neck sizer.