Micro-betting Odds Calculation via Preliminary Data Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In micro-betting or micro-wagering on live sporting events, the short window between a play's start and outcome can hinder bettors who react slowly or prefer deeper thought, making future wagers or those based on combinations of events less relevant, aligning more with traditional sports betting rather than micro-betting's needs.

Innovation Solution

A system that collects data on past and current plays in a live sporting event, compares it to historical data, and calculates odds for future actions, allowing for wagers on upcoming events before the current play concludes, using sensors and historical play databases to determine and display odds for next actions such as player substitutions or subsequent plays.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If odds are calculated only after a play concludes, then measurement accuracy is improved, but response time deteriorates making wagers irrelevant for slow-reacting bettors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveodds calculation accuracyVSAvoidwager placement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting data during the current play and pre-calculating odds for the next play before the current play concludes. This allows bettors to place wagers on future plays in advance, addressing the time constraint issue while maintaining odds accuracy through continuous data collection and historical comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If data collection continues until play conclusion, then odds accuracy is improved, but wager relevance deteriorates for future plays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveodds calculation accuracyVSAvoidwager opportunity frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system stops data collection before the current play concludes and uses accumulated data to calculate odds for future plays. This preliminary action enables the system to offer wagers on upcoming plays while maintaining sufficient accuracy through historical data comparison, thereby increasing wager opportunity frequency without sacrificing odds quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the data collection window based on the play's progression and the specific wager type. By flexibly determining when to stop collecting data and switch to historical comparison, the system optimizes both odds accuracy and wager relevance for different sporting scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of time

If wagers are offered on distant future events, then bettor decision time is improved, but micro-betting relevance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebettor decision timeVSAvoidmicro-betting market fit
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments wagering opportunities into distinct time-based categories: immediate next-play wagers, future play wagers, and combination wagers. This segmentation allows the system to offer multiple wager types with different time horizons, accommodating both quick-reacting bettors and those needing more decision time while maintaining micro-betting relevance through play-by-play granularity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240304060A1On deck wagering
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 ADRENALINE IP
  • US20240304060A1 patent drawing
  • US20240304060A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of wagering on micro markets that are not related to the current play. For example, wagering on the outcome of the third batter due up in the inning.