Micro-Chain Blockchain Architecture for Fast Secure Consensus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing blockchain systems face challenges in transaction processing speed, scalability, and security, making them unsuitable for commercial services due to energy consumption, centralization, and slow confirmation times.

Innovation Solution

A blockchain provision system utilizing a non-competitive consensus algorithm and micro-chain architecture, featuring equalizer nodes with proof of stake consensus and a mempool for transaction storage, along with a micro-service architecture for business domain-specific transaction processing, ensuring fast transaction processing, scalability, and security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If proof-of-work consensus algorithm is used, then security and decentralization are improved, but energy consumption increases and transaction processing speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:

ImprovesecurityVSAvoidenergy consumption

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of the consensus algorithm from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, transforming the security mechanism from computational effort to economic stake. This parameter change eliminates the energy-intensive mining process while maintaining security through validator staking and slashing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/computational system of proof-of-work (mining hardware, computational hashing) with an economic system of proof-of-stake (validator staking, economic penalties). This substitution eliminates the need for energy-intensive computational competition while achieving similar security goals through economic incentives and penalties.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If proof-of-work consensus algorithm is used, then security is improved, but transaction processing speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:

ImprovesecurityVSAvoidtransaction processing speed

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the consensus mechanism parameter from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, which fundamentally alters the transaction processing bottleneck. Instead of waiting for energy-intensive mining to complete, transactions are validated through stake-based selection and verification, dramatically reducing confirmation time while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If number of nodes is increased, then decentralization is improved, but scalability decreases due to increased verification complexity

Engineering Contradiction:

ImprovedecentralizationVSAvoidverification complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the verification parameter from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, where validators are selected based on their economic stake rather than computational complexity. This parameter change allows the system to scale with more nodes while maintaining manageable verification complexity, as stake-based selection is computationally simpler than proof-of-work validation.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If competitive consensus algorithm is used, then decentralization is improved, but transaction processing speed decreases and confirmation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:

ImprovedecentralizationVSAvoidconfirmation time

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the competitive aspect of consensus by using a non-competitive proof-of-stake mechanism. Instead of validators competing through computational work (which creates confirmation delays), validators are selected based on their stake, enabling faster transaction inclusion and confirmation while maintaining decentralization.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

5Reliability

If gas value increases to ensure integrity, then security is improved, but transaction fee increases non-negligibly

Engineering Contradiction:

ImproveintegrityVSAvoidtransaction fee

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the integrity mechanism from gas-based economic incentives to stake-based security with slashing. This parameter change allows the system to maintain security and integrity without relying on high gas fees, as the proof-of-stake mechanism provides inherent security through validator staking and economic penalties for misconduct.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12586064B2Blockchain provision system and method using non-competitive consensus algorithm and micro-chain architecture to ensure transaction processing speed, scalability, and security suitable for commercial services

Publication Date: 2026.03.24 EQBR HLDG CO LTD

AI summary

Provided is a blockchain provision system using a non-competitive consensus algorithm and micro-chain architecture to ensure transaction processing speed, scalability, and security useful for commercial services. The system includes: a network providing the blockchain services. The network includes: mainnets communicating with other micro-chains according to an inter-chain communication protocol and issuing or burning a coin, and a micro-chain architecture connected to the mainnet and including a plurality of micro-chains in which a smart contract conclusion performed using the coin operates according to each area, and the micro-chains independently perform business logic without interfering with each other, and execute different business logics to execute smart contracts corresponding to the micro-chains, respectively.