Micro-Component Fenders for Stiction Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Micro-components in the micron range face challenges with stiction, adhering to each other due to van der Waals, electrostatic, and hydrogen bonding forces, making handling and separation difficult, especially when stored or transferred in unstructured arrangements.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of micro-components with fenders protruding from both sides of the component substrate, positioned closer to the corners than the center, which prevent significant areas from coming into close proximity, thereby inhibiting stiction forces by acting as physical buffers and alignment structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If micro-components are stored or transferred in unstructured arrangements, then handling and distribution flexibility is improved, but stiction between micro-components increases making separation difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling flexibilityVSAvoidstiction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces fenders as intermediary structures that physically separate micro-components from each other. These fenders act as mediators that prevent direct contact between micro-component substrates, thereby eliminating stiction while allowing the micro-components to be stored and handled in flexible unstructured arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a vertical dimension to the problem by extending fenders upward from the substrate surface. This dimensional addition creates spatial separation between adjacent micro-components, preventing them from coming into close proximity and adhering through stiction forces while maintaining horizontal flexibility in arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If fenders are positioned closer to corners than center, then stiction prevention is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestiction preventionVSAvoidfender positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric positioning of fenders, placing them closer to the corners of the rectangular substrate rather than at the center. This asymmetric arrangement is more effective at preventing stiction because it maximizes separation at the corners where micro-components are most likely to adhere, while the manufacturing process remains compatible with standard photolithographic techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Volume of moving object

If micro-components are made smaller for portable devices, then device size is reduced, but handling difficulty increases due to stiction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicro-component sizeVSAvoidhandling ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the micro-component structure by adding separate fender elements that are distinct from the main functional substrate. This segmentation allows the fenders to perform the specific function of preventing stiction, while the miniaturized substrate maintains its compact size for portable devices, thus resolving the contradiction between small size and handling ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The fenders effectively prevent substantial stiction between micro-components, allowing for easier handling and separation, even in the absence of adhesive materials, by maintaining spatial separation and reducing attractive forces, thus facilitating their distribution and manipulation.

Implementation Method 1

Micro-components in the micron range face challenges with stiction, adhering to each other due to van der Waals, electrostatic, and hydrogen bonding forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effectvan der Waals force: Van der Waals Force

Implementation Method 2

Micro-components in the micron range face challenges with stiction, adhering to each other due to van der Waals, electrostatic, and hydrogen bonding forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 3

Micro-components in the micron range face challenges with stiction, adhering to each other due to van der Waals, electrostatic, and hydrogen bonding forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogen bonding: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS11670603B2Micro-component anti-stiction structures
Publication Date: 2023.06.06 X CELEPRINT LIMITED
  • US11670603B2 patent drawing
  • US11670603B2 patent drawing
  • US11670603B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A micro-component comprises a component substrate having a first side and an opposing second side. Fenders project from the first and second sides of the component substrate and include first-side fenders extending from the first side and a second-side fender extending from the second side of the component substrate. At least two of the first-side fenders have a non-conductive surface and are disposed closer to a corner of the component substrate than to a center of the component substrate.