Micro-Crack Detection via Dynamic Image Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods, such as digital image correlation, struggle to detect and predict micro-cracks in concrete structures before they lead to structural instability, as they rely on visible surface defects and cannot identify potentially fatal micro-cracks before stability is compromised.

Innovation Solution

A method involving image correlation techniques to capture and compare images of a structure under different loading conditions, determining critical damage strain values, and calculating strain matrices to detect micro-cracks and predict their propagation, allowing for early detection and intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If digital image correlation is used to detect structural defects, then visible surface defects can be detected, but micro-cracks cannot be detected before they lead to structural instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidmicro-crack detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the measurement process into multiple loading stages (first loading condition and second loading condition) with different magnitudes. By capturing images at each stage and comparing deformations, the method isolates and detects micro-crack formation and propagation that occur between stages, enabling detection of defects too small to be visible in single images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary loading (first loading condition) to induce initial micro-cracks before the structure reaches a critically damaged state. Images are captured during this preliminary phase, allowing detection and intervention before the micro-cracks propagate into macro-cracks that compromise structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If early detection of micro-cracks is implemented, then structural integrity can be maintained, but existing detection methods lack the sensitivity to detect micro-cracks in time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmicro-crack detection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic loading conditions with varying magnitudes (first and second loading conditions) rather than static inspection. By applying controlled dynamic loads and capturing images at different stages, the method reveals micro-crack behavior under stress, enabling detection of defects that remain invisible under normal service conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the loading parameter (magnitude of applied load) between two distinct conditions. The first loading condition applies a lower load to capture initial state, while the second applies a higher load to induce and reveal micro-cracks. Comparing images from these different parameter states enables detection of subtle structural defects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If visible surface defects are used for detection, then simple imaging techniques work, but potentially fatal micro-cracks remain undetected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection method simplicityVSAvoiddefect detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the detection process into multiple image capture stages under different loading conditions. Instead of relying on single static images that only show visible defects, the method captures images at multiple points in the loading process and compares them to reveal micro-crack formation and propagation that are invisible in individual images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces deformation comparison as an intermediary mechanism between the structure and the detection system. By comparing deformations between images captured under different loading conditions, the method indirectly reveals the presence and propagation of micro-cracks that cannot be directly observed, bridging the gap between simple imaging and sophisticated defect detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the early detection of micro-cracks and prediction of their propagation, preventing irreversible structural damage by identifying vulnerable areas and allowing for timely reinforcement or repair, thus maintaining structural integrity and safety.

Implementation Method 1

obtaining a deformation matrix comprising a deformation value at each position of the position matrix by using an image correlation technique on the first and second images, and by comparing deformation of corresponding parts of the surface captured therein

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImage correlation: Photogrammetry

Data Source

PatentUS10520298B2Structural damage detection
Publication Date: 2019.12.31 BAE SYSTEMS PLC
  • US10520298B2 patent drawing
  • US10520298B2 patent drawing
  • US10520298B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method of assessing a structural defect presence in a structure, the method comprising the steps of: determining at least one critical damage strain value of the structure, capturing a first image of a surface of the structure under a first loading condition; capturing a second image of the surface of the structure under a second loading condition; assigning a position matrix on the captured first image; obtaining a deformation matrix comprising a deformation value at each position of the position matrix by using an image correlation technique on the first and second images, and by comparing deformation of corresponding parts of the surface captured therein; calculating a strain matrix using the obtained deformation matrix; and determining a micro-crack to be present at a position if an element of the strain matrix representing the strain at the position is greater than or equal to a predetermined critical damage strain value, wherein the critical damage strain value is a strain value at which a micro-crack is detected or predicted to appear and/or propagate.