Micro-Doppler Radar Insect Classification for Real-Time Crop Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pest monitoring methods in crops are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and lack real-time precision, leading to excessive pesticide use and ineffective control of insect and animal infestations, with limited species detection and reliance on human expertise.

Innovation Solution

A centimeter-wave radar system with low power consumption and reduced cost, capable of detecting and classifying insects and animals using Doppler and micro-Doppler spectrograms, integrated with a neural network for real-time identification and quantification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional fieldwork monitoring methods are used, then labor intensity is reduced, but measurement precision and real-time detection capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabor intensityVSAvoiddetection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical fieldwork monitoring with a radar-based detection system. The radar system uses electromagnetic waves to detect and classify insects and animals automatically, eliminating the need for manual sampling while providing precise real-time detection of pest populations, their geographic distribution, and species identification through spectrogram analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a radar system as an intermediary between the monitor and the pest population. The radar system acts as a mediator that automatically detects, classifies, and quantifies pests without requiring direct human observation, thereby maintaining ease of operation while significantly improving measurement precision and real-time detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If sampling methods are used for monitoring, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and real-time monitoring capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring system complexityVSAvoidmonitoring efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual sampling procedures with an automated radar system that continuously monitors pest populations. The radar system processes electromagnetic wave reflections to detect and classify insects and animals in real-time, dramatically improving monitoring productivity while keeping the system relatively simple through the use of established radar technology and signal processing algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous monitoring through the radar system, which operates without interruption to detect pest movements and population changes. This continuous action replaces the discontinuous sampling approach, enabling real-time detection of infestation onset and providing ongoing productivity data without requiring repeated manual interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Device complexity

If manual insect identification is used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and species detection capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification system complexityVSAvoidspecies identification precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual identification with automated radar-based spectrogram analysis. The system processes the frequency spectrum of radar reflections to extract characteristic patterns for different insect and animal species, enabling precise automated identification without requiring expert technicians. The neural network component further enhances species detection accuracy by learning and recognizing spectral signatures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital copy of the radar signal spectrum (spectrogram) as a representation of the pest population characteristics. This spectral copy contains identifiable patterns that can be automatically analyzed to determine species composition, replacing the need for physical collection and manual identification while maintaining or improving identification precision through digital pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Loss of time

If delayed monitoring is used, then loss of time is reduced, but loss of information about infestation onset and precise location deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring time intervalVSAvoidinfestation detection information
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous real-time monitoring through the radar system, which continuously scans the monitored area to detect any changes in pest population. This continuous action eliminates time delays between infestation occurrence and detection, providing immediate information about infestation onset, geographic distribution, and population dynamics without requiring periodic sampling intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the radar system continuously monitors pest populations and provides real-time information about infestation status. This feedback enables timely detection of infestation onset and geographic distribution patterns, allowing for immediate response actions and preventing the loss of critical timing information that occurs with delayed monitoring approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables real-time, precise monitoring of pest populations and their geographic distribution, optimizing pesticide use and enhancing control efficacy by providing accurate, species-specific detection and classification.

Implementation Method 1

the detection of insects and animals by radar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

capturing the reflected signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEcho: Echo

Implementation Method 3

analysis of the spectrogram of the Doppler signal generated by its movement and wing flapping

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler effect: Doppler Effect

Implementation Method 4

analysis of the spectrogram of the Doppler signal generated by its movement and wing flapping

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMicro-Doppler: Doppler Effect

Data Source

PatentEP4609712A1Method for detecting and classifying insects and classification of insects and animals
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 RADAZ INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO DE PRODUTOS ELETRONICOS LTDA
  • EP4609712A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4609712A1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4609712A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Method for detection and classification of insects and animals, aiming at pest control affecting crops and, more specifically, the detection of insects and animals through radar. The invention comprises the comparison between a set of patterns derived from the echo of a centimeter-wave radar signal captured in the field by an operational radar (900) and the characteristic signature of each animal species (80, 921) determined through data processing carried out in a laboratory. This processing involves the generation of a spectrogram (420) from the Doppler signal produced by the movement of the animal species' appendages (80), which, in the case of insects, consists of wing flapping. For each species, a signature is generated from the spectrogram and the relevant patterns selected among the group consisting of standard deviation, kurtosis, skewness, entropy, and energy of the radar signal echo.