Micro-imagery Security Element Design Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security document printing methods, such as gravure printing, suffer from defects like feathering, which cause irregular ink distribution and distortions, making it difficult to produce complex micro-optic security features that are resistant to counterfeiting.

Innovation Solution

A security element is created on a substrate with integrated first and second image portions, including micro-image elements and opacifying/design elements, printed using a single tool to minimize distortions and enhance counterfeiting resistance, featuring a combination of micro-lenses for observation, and utilizing a window or half-window design for added security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If rotary print methods such as gravure printing are used to apply micro-image elements to the substrate, then the security feature can be produced with the desired thinness and small focal length, but printing defects such as feathering occur causing irregular ink distribution and edge distortions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint qualityVSAvoidprinting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the printing process into two distinct stages: first printing the micro-image elements using gravure printing, then printing the design elements using offset printing. This segmentation allows each printing method to be optimized for its specific task, avoiding the feathering defect that would occur if all elements were printed in a single gravure pass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary step where the substrate is first prepared with micro-image elements, then a second printing process is applied. The offset printing process acts as an intermediary that can accommodate the pre-printed micro-image elements without causing feathering, while still allowing design elements to be added.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate printing processes are used for micro-image elements and design elements, then printing flexibility is maintained, but production time and tooling costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting flexibilityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the advantages of two different printing methods into a single integrated security feature. The gravure-printed micro-image elements and offset-printed design elements are combined on the same substrate, creating a unified security feature that leverages the precision of gravure printing for micro-elements and the flexibility of offset printing for design elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate serves multiple functions: it acts as the base for micro-image elements, carries design elements, and provides the structural support for the entire security feature. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components and simplifies the overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the security feature uses complex integrated design with multiple image portions, then counterfeiting resistance increases, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounterfeiting resistanceVSAvoidsecurity element structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using different printing methods for different regions of the security feature. Gravure printing is used specifically for the micro-image elements where precision is critical, while offset printing is used for the design elements where flexibility and cost-effectiveness are more important. This localized approach to manufacturing complexity reduces overall difficulty while maintaining high counterfeiting resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The integrated design increases the complexity of security features, reducing the likelihood of successful counterfeiting and minimizing print distortions, while also reducing tooling costs through shared printing processes, resulting in a more durable and secure security document.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of focussing elements disposed on or in the viewing side of the substrate for observing the one or more micro-image elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight: Light

Data Source

PatentUS11331937B2Micro-imagery design integration
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 CCL SECURE PTY LTD
  • US11331937B2 patent drawing
  • US11331937B2 patent drawing
  • US11331937B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A security element formed on a substrate having a printing side and a viewing side is provided, the security element including: a first image portion provided on the printing side of the substrate, the first image portion including one or more micro-image elements; a second image portion provided on the printing side and/or the viewing side of the substrate; and a plurality of focussing elements disposed on or in the viewing side of the substrate for observing the one or more micro-image elements; wherein the first image portion and the second image portion are integrated into at least one distinguishable security element when observed from the viewing side of the substrate.