Micro-reactor Methanation Segmented Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methanation reactors face challenges in achieving optimal temperature control to prevent hotspot formation, catalyst deactivation, and efficient CO2 conversion, leading to issues with methane purity and reactor efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A reactor design with a convoluted channel and column structure for the cooling fluid inlets and outlets, allowing for flow reversal and uniform cooling, which helps maintain a stable temperature profile and prevents hotspot formation, while optimizing CO2 conversion and methane purity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If conventional cooling methods are used in methanation reactors, then cooling is provided, but hotspot formation occurs and catalyst deactivation results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature uniformityVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling space is segmented into multiple regions with separate inlets and outlets for cooling fluid. This segmentation allows different zones of the catalyst bed to be cooled independently, preventing localized hotspot formation and ensuring uniform temperature distribution across the entire reactor, thereby maintaining catalyst stability and preventing deactivation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the cooling space are provided with customized cooling configurations including varying inlet/outlet arrangements and convoluted channel structures. This local quality approach ensures that each region receives appropriate cooling intensity based on its specific thermal requirements, effectively preventing hotspot formation while maintaining overall temperature uniformity and catalyst reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If temperature is increased to prevent metal carbonyl formation, then catalyst discharge is prevented, but CO2 conversion efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst retentionVSAvoidCO2 conversion rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor maintains temperatures above 200°C to prevent metal carbonyl formation and catalyst discharge, while the segmented cooling system with convoluted channels ensures efficient heat removal to maintain high CO2 conversion rates. This parameter optimization balances catalyst retention requirements with productivity demands by precisely controlling temperature within the optimal range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling fluid acts as an intermediary that removes excess heat from the catalyst bed, enabling the reactor to maintain temperatures that prevent catalyst discharge while still achieving high CO2 conversion. The cooling system mediates between the competing requirements of temperature maintenance for catalyst stability and temperature control for conversion efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If reactor volume is increased to improve CO2 conversion, then conversion efficiency increases, but reactor size and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 conversion efficiencyVSAvoidreactor volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is segmented into multiple cooling zones with optimized inlet/outlet configurations, allowing efficient heat removal in a compact volume. This segmentation enables high CO2 conversion efficiency without requiring excessive reactor volume, as each zone is optimized for maximum conversion while the overall system remains compact and cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The convoluted channel structures and multi-directional cooling fluid flow paths utilize three-dimensional space efficiently within the reactor. This dimensional optimization allows sufficient cooling surface area and contact time for high CO2 conversion without increasing the external reactor volume, maintaining a compact and economical design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Temperature

If cooling fluid flow rate is increased to prevent hotspots, then temperature control improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control precisionVSAvoidcooling energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling fluid flow is segmented into multiple streams with separate inlets and outlets distributed throughout the reactor. This segmentation allows each zone to receive optimized cooling flow rates based on local heat generation, improving temperature control precision while minimizing overall energy consumption by avoiding excessive cooling in all regions simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the reactor receive customized cooling fluid flow rates and channel configurations matched to their specific thermal demands. This local quality approach ensures precise temperature control in hot zones while reducing cooling intensity in cooler zones, thereby improving overall temperature control precision without proportionally increasing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The reactor design ensures uniform catalyst bed cooling, reduces catalyst deactivation, and achieves high CO2 conversion efficiency, resulting in a compact, cost-effective, and efficient methanation process.

Implementation Method 1

cooling of the catalyst bed... by evaporation of the cooling fluid... heat transfer medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

cooling of the catalyst bed... by evaporation of the cooling fluid... maximum end temperature in the heat transfer medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS11229894B2Micro-reactor and method implementation for methanation
Publication Date: 2022.01.25 KARLSRUHER INST FUR TECH
  • US11229894B2 patent drawing
  • US11229894B2 patent drawing
  • US11229894B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a reactor, preferably microreactor, for methanation, and to the operation of this reactor, i.e. to the process regime for preparation of methane.