Automated Microbe Mixture Detection in Mass Spectrometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mass-spectrometric methods for identifying microorganisms require specialist assessment to differentiate between closely related microbe species and detect mixtures, which is impractical in routine laboratories due to the need for taxonomic expertise and manual evaluation of similarity scores.

Innovation Solution

Automated methods using similarity calculations and exclusion lists or similarity thresholds to determine the presence of microbe mixtures by analyzing the similarity between reference spectra, allowing for computer-programmed evaluation of score lists to identify microbe species in mixtures without requiring taxonomic expertise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual assessment by specialists is used to differentiate between closely related microbe species and detect mixtures, then identification accuracy is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to the need for taxonomic expertise and manual evaluation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-assessment through automated algorithms that calculate similarity scores between sample spectra and reference spectra, eliminating the need for specialist manual evaluation. The computer program automatically determines whether mixtures are present and identifies microbe species based on predefined criteria and thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of specialist assessment is replaced by an automated computational system. The computer program calculates similarity indicators, compares spectra, and makes identification decisions algorithmically, substituting human expert analysis with automated information processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If manual evaluation of similarity scores is used to detect microbe mixtures, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to the time-consuming nature of manual assessment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixture detection accuracyVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects mixtures by comparing similarity scores against predefined thresholds and analyzing spectral patterns without requiring manual intervention. The computer program performs the entire evaluation process autonomously, maintaining high detection accuracy while eliminating time-consuming manual steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system enables continuous processing of multiple samples without interruption by manual assessment. The computer program can evaluate numerous spectra sequentially or in parallel, maintaining constant productivity while preserving the precision of mixture detection through systematic algorithmic analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Ease of operation

If automated methods with similarity thresholds are used to identify microbe mixtures, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision may deteriorate without specialist expertise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoididentification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates preliminary action by pre-programming similarity thresholds, exclusion lists, and identification criteria based on established taxonomic knowledge. These predefined parameters encode specialist expertise into the automated system, ensuring accurate mixture detection and species identification without requiring ongoing manual expert intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where similarity scores are continuously calculated and compared against reference data and thresholds. The computer program adjusts and refines identification decisions based on the degree of similarity between sample and reference spectra, maintaining high precision through systematic evaluation and comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2880450B1Detection of mixtures in mass-spectrometric microbe identification
Publication Date: 2017.11.29 BRUKER DALTONIK GMBH
  • EP2880450B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The invention relates to the identification of microbes in a sample by calculating the similarities between a mass spectrum of the sample and all reference spectra in a spectral library; it particularly concerns the detection of microbe mixtures. Microbe mixtures are probably present if several microbe species which are not closely related to each other are among the score list containing the most similar reference spectra. Methods are proposed which (1) operate with a list of the relationships, (2) determine the similarity between the reference spectra of the different microbe species of the score list, or (3) always carry out a mixture analysis in accordance with document DE 10 2009 007 266 Al from the score list, with the generation of combination spectra, and only afterwards check the similarity of the combined spectra and thus the relationship between the microbe strains concerned.