Microbeam Radiation Therapy Collimator for Tissue-Sparing Dosage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radiation therapies often cause significant damage to healthy tissues surrounding tumors due to the lack of precision in delivering radiation doses, and existing methods are inefficient in treating deep-seated or superficial tumors effectively.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of microbeam radiation therapy (MBRS) using high-energy, narrow, quasi-parallel X-ray microbeams that are shaped and attenuated to create alternating high-dose and low-dose regions, allowing for precise targeting of tumors while minimizing damage to adjacent healthy tissue through the use of a collimator and beam-shaping systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional radiation therapy uses wide beams to treat tumors, then the radiation can penetrate deep into tissue, but significant damage occurs to healthy surrounding tissues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage to healthy tissueVSAvoidprecision of radiation targeting
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The radiation beam is segmented into multiple narrow microbeams (10-200 micrometers wide) separated by valley regions. This segmentation allows the radiation to target tumor cells while leaving healthy tissue in the valley regions relatively spared, resolving the contradiction between penetration and healthy tissue damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the radiation field are given different qualities: peak regions deliver high radiation doses to kill tumor cells, while valley regions deliver low doses to preserve healthy tissue. This local differentiation of radiation quality enables selective tumor destruction while protecting surrounding healthy structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If microbeam width is reduced to 10-200 micrometers to spare healthy tissue, then healthy tissue repair is enabled, but the complexity of beam shaping and delivery increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation damage to normal tissueVSAvoidcomplexity of microbeam delivery system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The microbeam delivery system incorporates dynamic elements including movable collimators, adjustable beam energies (30 to several hundred keV), and variable microbeam spacing (50-500 micrometers). These dynamic parameters allow optimization of the microbeam pattern for different tumor depths and sizes, managing the complexity through adaptability rather than fixed rigid structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters simultaneously: beam energy (30- several hundred keV), microbeam width (10-200 micrometers), and valley spacing (50-500 micrometers). By coordinating changes in these parameters, the system achieves effective tumor treatment with healthy tissue protection without requiring excessively complex fixed geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If high radiation dosage is delivered to ensure tumor cell death, then tumor control is improved, but damage to proximal and distal healthy tissues increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetumor treatment effectivenessVSAvoiddamage to proximal and distal healthy tissue
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The radiation dose is delivered in a periodic pattern of peaks and valleys along the beam path. High doses (peaks) are delivered at specific intervals to ensure tumor cell death, while low-dose valleys periodically intervene to allow healthy tissue recovery. This periodic dosing pattern maintains tumor control effectiveness while reducing cumulative damage to healthy tissues proximal and distal to the target.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

MBRS enables effective treatment of tumors with reduced radiation-induced damage to non-targeted tissues by allowing endothelial cells to repair damaged vasculature, providing a quicker and more accurate form of radiation therapy compared to conventional methods.

Implementation Method 1

passing the shaped and attenuated beam through a collimator to produce high-dose regions transversely alternating with low-dose regions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeometric filtering: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 2

shaping, attenuating, and increasing the penetration of the high-energy radiation beam using a low-atomic-weight (i.e., a low-Z) filter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS9375587B2Low dose-rate radiation for medical and veterinary therapies with three dimensionally shaped profiles
Publication Date: 2016.06.28 COPERNICUS DYNAMICS GROUP LP

AI summary

Various embodiments relate to a method of performing microbeam radiation therapy (microbeam radiosurgery) for a subject, including: producing a high-energy radiation beam; shaping, attenuating, strengthening, hardening and/or otherwise appropriately modifying the high-energy radiation beam using a low-Z, high-Z, or variable-Z filter; passing the beam before or after it has been so modified through a collimator to produce high-dose regions alternating with low-dose regions; and irradiating the subject with the collimated beam so modified.