Microbial Community Structure Analysis via Interaction Factors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for analyzing community structures in environmental samples primarily focus on the presence or absence of specific organisms, failing to provide insights into inter-microbial interactions and are challenging to interpret, especially with large datasets, leading to an incomplete understanding of microbial community dynamics.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determine abundance values for taxonomic groups and compute interaction factors between them, generating a taxa interaction profile and community structure analysis profile to visualize and cluster samples based on both abundance and interaction patterns, facilitating the identification of key organisms and their interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional techniques focusing only on presence or absence of organisms are used, then the analysis method is simple, but the understanding of microbial community dynamics is incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis method complexityVSAvoidmicrobial community dynamics information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The analysis is segmented into multiple dimensions: (1) presence/absence of organisms, (2) relative abundance of each taxonomic group, and (3) interaction patterns between taxonomic groups. This segmentation allows comprehensive characterization of microbial communities while maintaining analytical structure through separate computational modules for each dimension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds new dimensions to the analysis by computing interaction factors between taxonomic groups and incorporating relative abundance data. This transforms the analysis from a single-dimension presence/absence approach to a multi-dimensional framework that includes abundance levels and interaction strengths, providing a more complete picture of microbial community dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of information

If interaction factors between taxonomic groups are computed, then the understanding of microbial interactions is improved, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinter-microbial interaction informationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computation of interaction factors is segmented into discrete pairwise comparisons between taxonomic groups. By calculating interaction factors for each pair separately and then aggregating them, the system manages computational complexity through modular processing rather than attempting to model all interactions simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent computes interaction factors for all pairs of taxonomic groups present in the metagenomic sequences. While this comprehensive approach increases computational requirements, it ensures no interaction information is missed. The system accepts this computational cost to achieve complete interaction profiling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If clustering based on both abundance and interaction patterns is performed, then the differentiation of environmental samples is improved, but the analysis complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample differentiation precisionVSAvoidanalysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The clustering process is segmented into distinct stages: first, interaction factors are computed for all taxonomic group pairs; second, relative abundance values are determined; third, both datasets are integrated into the clustering algorithm. This segmentation allows each component to be processed and validated separately before integration, managing overall analysis complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges two previously separate analysis dimensions (abundance data and interaction pattern data) into a unified clustering framework. By combining these complementary information sources, the system achieves more precise sample differentiation than would be possible using either dimension alone, despite the increased analytical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2587393B1Analysis of community structures in environmental samples
Publication Date: 2018.09.05 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • EP2587393B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP2587393B1 patent drawingFigure 1b
  • EP2587393B1 patent drawingFigure 2a

AI summary

Systems and methods for analyzing community structures within a plurality of environmental samples are described herein. The method includes obtaining taxa data corresponding to taxonomic groups within the plurality of the environmental samples. Based on the taxa data, an abundance value for each of the taxonomic groups with respect to each of the plurality of environmental samples is determined. Further, based on abundance values, an interaction factor for each pair of the taxonomic groups in the plurality of environmental samples is computed. The interaction factor is indicative of a degree of interaction between a pair of taxonomic groups from among the taxonomic groups. Based in part on interaction factors and abundance values, the plurality of the environmental samples is clustered.