Microcell Electroless Plating for Bubble-Free Deposition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electroless metal deposition methods face issues such as ambient oxygen interference, hydrogen bubble entrapment, unstable plating solutions, high costs due to expensive chemicals and complex monitoring, and inefficient use of plating solutions, leading to defects and increased operational costs.

Innovation Solution

A microcell technology that uses a small volume of fluid enclosed in a treatment space for electroless plating, allowing for controlled temperature, pH, and chemical concentration, minimizing hydrogen formation, and enabling efficient use of unstable reactants with recycling, and dynamic control of treatment processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a conventional open bath system is used for electroless plating, then the plating solution can be easily accessed and applied, but ambient oxygen interferes with metal deposition and volatile components evaporate causing contamination and increased heating costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility of plating solutionVSAvoidoxygen interference and evaporation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a closed reaction chamber that maintains an inert atmosphere (nitrogen or argon) to prevent oxygen from interfering with the electroless plating process. This eliminates oxidation of the plating solution and prevents unwanted side reactions, while also containing volatile components to prevent evaporation and contamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the plating solution from the open environment and contains it within a sealed reaction chamber. This isolation removes the harmful interactions with ambient air while maintaining controlled access for substrate processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Duration of action of moving object

If a large volume plating bath is used, then sufficient plating solution is available for extended processing, but the cost of chemicals and waste treatment increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing durationVSAvoidchemical cost and waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a plating solution recovery system where the solution is continuously circulated, filtered to remove deposited metal, and reused. This recycling approach extends the usable life of expensive plating chemicals while maintaining consistent plating quality over extended processing periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a dynamic plating solution management system with continuous circulation, filtration, and replenishment mechanisms. This allows the system to adapt solution quality in real-time, extending processing duration without proportionally increasing chemical consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If conventional face-down plating configuration is used, then the substrate can be immersed in plating solution, but hydrogen bubbles become trapped on the plating surface causing defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate immersionVSAvoidplating uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional plating configuration by positioning the substrate face-up during electroless plating. This orientation allows hydrogen bubbles to naturally detach from the plating surface due to buoyancy, preventing bubble entrapment defects while maintaining effective plating solution contact with the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Reliability

If expensive plating chemicals are used to maintain solution stability, then deposition quality is improved, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution stabilityVSAvoidchemical cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes plating solution parameters including pH control, temperature maintenance, and chemical concentration ratios to achieve stable deposition with reduced reliance on expensive stabilizing agents. The controlled inert atmosphere also prevents oxidation that would otherwise require additional costly additives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables high-throughput, cost-effective electroless plating with reduced defects, efficient use of chemicals, and improved process control, achieving uniform metal deposition and reduced waste treatment costs.

Implementation Method 1

a chemical reduction-oxidation (redox) reaction of dissolved metal ions in solution to achieve the desired metal deposition on a substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 2

The substrate is heated to an elevated temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

A byproduct of most electroless plating oxidation half-reactions (i.e., the oxidation of the reducing agent)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation reaction: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS7690324B1Small-volume electroless plating cell
Publication Date: 2010.04.06 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS INC
  • US7690324B1 patent drawing
  • US7690324B1 patent drawing
  • US7690324B1 patent drawing

AI summary

During fluid treatment of a substrate surface, a carrier/wafer assembly containing a substrate wafer closes the top of a microcell container. The carrier/wafer assembly and the container walls define a thin enclosed treatment volume that is filled with treating fluid, such as electroless plating solution. The thin fluid-treatment volume typically has a volume in a range of about from 100 ml to 500 ml. Preferably a container is heated and the treating fluid is pre-heated before being injected into the container. Preferably, the chemical composition, temperature, and other properties of fluid in the thin enclosed fluid-treatment volume are dynamically variable. A rinse shield and a rinse nozzle are located above the container. A carrier/wafer assembly in a rinse position substantially closes the top of the rinse shield.