Microchannel Heat Exchanger Pressure Spike Control in Refrigerant Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microchannel heat exchangers in refrigerant systems are susceptible to pressure spikes during start-up or transient conditions, leading to nuisance shutdowns and inability to control environmental parameters.

Innovation Solution

A control system that operates the compressor and expansion device to reduce pressure spikes by using compressor unloading, variable speed control, and expansion device bypassing to manage refrigerant flow and pressure, including the use of sensors and feedback loops to prevent excessive pressure buildup.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If microchannel heat exchangers are used, then heat exchange efficiency and compactness are improved, but pressure spikes occur during transient conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange efficiencyVSAvoidpressure stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary actions by detecting transient conditions (start-up, shutdown, operational regime changes) and proactively adjusting compressor operation and expansion device positioning before pressure spikes can occur. This preventive control approach allows the system to maintain the benefits of microchannel heat exchangers while avoiding pressure instability issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts compressor operation (including unloading and variable speed control) and expansion device positioning based on real-time detection of transient conditions. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize heat exchange efficiency while maintaining pressure stability during changing operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Volume of moving object

If microchannel heat exchangers are used, then system compactness is improved, but pressure spikes lead to nuisance shutdowns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem compactnessVSAvoidoperational continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors system conditions and provides feedback to adjust compressor operation and expansion device positioning. This closed-loop control detects transient conditions and implements corrective actions to prevent pressure spikes that would cause nuisance shutdowns, thereby maintaining operational continuity while preserving system compactness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system takes preliminary actions by detecting transient conditions and proactively adjusting system operation before pressure spikes occur. This preventive approach eliminates the need for larger pressure relief components, maintaining system compactness while preventing operational interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If compressor operation is controlled to reduce pressure spikes, then pressure stability is improved, but system response time may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure stabilityVSAvoidsystem response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic control that adapts to different operational conditions. During transient conditions, the control system implements gradual compressor unloading and expansion device adjustment to maintain pressure stability. During steady-state operation, the system responds quickly to load changes. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between pressure stability and response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system implements periodic assessment of system conditions and applies corrective actions only when transient conditions are detected. This selective control approach maintains pressure stability during critical transient periods while allowing rapid response during steady-state operation, thus resolving the speed-stability trade-off.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS10107535B2Pressure spike reduction for refrigerant systems incorporating a microchannel heat exchanger
Publication Date: 2018.10.23 CARRIER CORP
  • US10107535B2 patent drawing
  • US10107535B2 patent drawing
  • US10107535B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A refrigerant system includes at least one compressor (54, 56) that compresses refrigerant and delivers it downstream to a heat rejection heat exchanger (26). The heat rejection heat exchanger is a microchannel heat exchanger. Refrigerant passes from the heat rejection heat exchanger downstream to an expansion device (60), from the expansion device through an evaporator (66), and from the evaporator back to the at least one compressor. A control (58) operates at least one compressor and the expansion device to reduce pressure spikes at transient conditions.