Microemulsion Foam Control Formulation for Oilfield Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current defoamer formulations face issues such as separation and deposition in unwanted locations, inefficiency in high alkaline media, and potential for catalyst poisoning in oilfield applications, along with instability at varying temperatures, leading to challenges in effectively controlling foam in complex oilfield environments.

Innovation Solution

A microemulsion-based foam control formulation comprising a primary surfactant with an HLB of 1 to 12 and a cloud point of 20 to 70°C, combined with a water-insoluble organic carrier liquid, which forms a stable and effective defoamer that prevents or reduces foam formation and is easy to manufacture and use in oilfield systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hydrophobic particulates are used in defoamer formulations, then foam breaking effectiveness is improved, but separation and deposition on equipment surfaces occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoam breaking effectivenessVSAvoiddeposition on equipment surfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the harmful hydrophobic particulates from the defoamer formulation, replacing them with a silicone-free emulsion system that achieves foam control without solid particles that cause deposition. The active defoaming agents are dissolved or dispersed in the emulsion phase rather than using suspended hydrophobic particles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state of the defoaming agents from solid particulates to liquid or dissolved state within the emulsion system. This parameter change eliminates the separation and deposition issues associated with solid particles while maintaining foam breaking effectiveness through the emulsion's interfacial activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If silicone antifoams are used in oilfield applications, then foam control is improved, but catalyst poisoning and product contamination occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoam control effectivenessVSAvoidcatalyst poisoning and product contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent explicitly removes silicone components from the defoamer formulation, creating a silicone-free emulsion system. This extraction eliminates the catalyst poisoning and product contamination risks associated with silicone antifoams while maintaining effective foam control through alternative defoaming mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Manufacturing precision

If complex processing is used to produce hydrophobically modified silica defoamers, then particle size distribution is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size distributionVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the need for complex hydrophobic modification processes and silica particle production. Instead of manufacturing engineered particulates requiring multi-step processing, the invention uses a simpler emulsion system where defoaming activity is provided by dissolved or dispersed emulsion components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive, complexly-manufactured modified silica particles with a simpler, more economical emulsion formulation that achieves comparable or superior performance without requiring sophisticated manufacturing infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Reliability

If low foam surfactants are used in defoamer formulations, then foam suppression is improved, but instability at low or high temperature occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoam suppression effectivenessVSAvoidtemperature stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite emulsion system combining multiple components (surfactants, oils, water) that work synergistically to provide both foam suppression and temperature stability. The emulsion structure itself provides thermal stability while the surfactant components deliver defoaming activity across a wide temperature range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the physical state and composition of the surfactant system by incorporating it into an emulsion matrix, which changes its thermal response characteristics. This allows the surfactant to maintain effectiveness and stability across low and high temperatures that would otherwise cause creaming or phase separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Reliability

If thick paste or cream formulations are used, then defoaming activity is improved, but pumpability and ease of use deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefoaming activityVSAvoidpumpability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the viscosity and physical state parameters of the formulation by creating a fluid emulsion system rather than a thick paste or cream. This parameter change maintains adequate defoaming activity while dramatically improving pumpability and ease of application in oilfield operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The microemulsion formulation provides stable, low-viscosity, and non-depositing antifoam performance across a wide temperature range, effectively reducing existing foam and preventing further foam formation, making it suitable for use in high-agitation environments like oilfield production systems without causing downstream operational issues.

Implementation Method 1

A microemulsion-based foam control formulation comprising a primary surfactant with an HLB of 1 to 12 and a cloud point of 20 to 70°C, combined with a water-insoluble organic carrier liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMicroemulsion: Microemulsion

Implementation Method 2

Commercial defoamer formulations may also contain hydrophobic particles to break the foam, by adsorbing to the air/liquid interface and changing the contact angle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 3

A major drawback of these defoamers is the separation of the particulates from the formulation, which may result in the particulates depositing in an unwanted manner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSeparation:

Data Source

PatentUS10293279B2Foam control formulations
Publication Date: 2019.05.21 ENERGY SOLUTIONS US LLC
  • US10293279B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides a foam control formulation in the form of a microemulsion, the formulation comprising: (a) from 5 to 70% w/w of primary surfactant, this surfactant having an HLB of from 1 to 12 and/or a cloud point of from 20 to 70° C.; (b) from 2 to 40% w/w of water-insoluble organic carrier liquid; and (c) water. Also provided is the use of this formulation to prevent and/or reduce foam in a fluid system, or as a processing aid to control foam production in a fluid system. The formulation may be used in an aqueous fluid system, such as an oilfield.