Microfiber Production for Cement Reinforcement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods face challenges in achieving uniform mixing and distribution of synthetic fibers, particularly polyolefin fibers, within cementitious mixtures, leading to inhomogeneous mixtures and limitations on the amount that can be added, which affects the mechanical properties and durability of concrete.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and process for producing monofilament microfibers, specifically polyolefin fibers, using a spinning head with controlled temperature and pressure in the cooling zone to achieve uniform dispersion and high surface contact with cement, allowing for the production of microfibers with diameters as low as 8.4 microns and linear densities of 0.5 dtex.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the amount of polyolefin fibers added to cement matrix is increased, then the mechanical properties and crack resistance improve, but the mixture becomes inhomogeneous with fiber aggregation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical propertiesVSAvoidhomogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fiber structure by reducing diameter to microfiber scale (≤20 microns, preferably 8-12 microns) and controlling linear density (0.4-1.0 dtex). This segmentation allows higher fiber content to be added without aggregation, as the smaller individual fiber units distribute more uniformly throughout the cement matrix while maintaining collective mechanical reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes critical parameters of the fiber: diameter reduced to 8-12 microns, linear density controlled at 0.4-1.0 dtex, and length optimized at 3-60 mm. These parameter changes enable the fiber-cement system to achieve both high fiber content (improving strength) and uniform distribution (maintaining homogeneity), resolving the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If fiber diameter is reduced to improve mixing uniformity, then the surface contact area with cement increases, but the fiber strength may decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing uniformityVSAvoidfiber strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes multiple parameters simultaneously: diameter (8-12 microns), linear density (0.4-1.0 dtex), and length (3-60 mm). This multi-parameter optimization ensures that even at reduced diameter for improved mixing uniformity, the fibers maintain sufficient strength through appropriate linear density control and material selection (polyolefin, preferably polypropylene).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite fiber structure with optional mineral fillers incorporated into the polyolefin matrix. This composite approach enhances fiber strength despite reduced diameter, allowing microfibers to maintain both excellent mixing uniformity and adequate mechanical strength for structural reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If macro-fibers are used to provide structural reinforcement, then the load-bearing capacity improves, but the mixing uniformity and surface contact area deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidmixing uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the reinforcement function across numerous small microfiber units rather than relying on fewer macrofiber elements. The microfibers (≤20 microns) distribute uniformly throughout the cement matrix, providing collective load-bearing capacity through high surface area contact while maintaining mixing uniformity that macrofibers cannot achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from macro-scale fiber reinforcement to micro-scale fiber reinforcement, effectively changing the dimensional scale of the reinforcement element. This dimensional change enables simultaneous achievement of uniform distribution (mixing homogeneity) and structural reinforcement capability, as the microfibers interact more extensively with the cement matrix throughout the three-dimensional volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process ensures uniform distribution and increased surface contact of microfibers within cement, enhancing the mechanical properties and durability of concrete by preventing crack formation and reinforcing the cement matrix.

Implementation Method 1

a cooling zone of the filaments extruded from the spinning head, characterized in that said cooling zone comprises maintaining means to maintain the gas in said zone at a temperature in the range of +20°C to -30°C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Implementation Method 2

means adapted to maintain a pressure in the range of 2200 Pa to 900 Pa within said cooling zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure control: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP4575050A1Apparatus and process for the production of microfibers
Publication Date: 2025.06.25 FARE
  • EP4575050A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4575050A1 patent drawing
  • EP4575050A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for producing a polymer fiber having size of less than 1.5 dtex comprises the steps of extruding or co-extruding at least one polymer through a spinning head to form a plurality of filaments which are cooled at a temperature in the range of +20°C to -30°C and a pressure in the range of 2200 Pa to 900 Pa.