Microfluidic Actuator Array for Simultaneous Particle Trajectory Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies, such as optical tweezers and electrophoresis, are limited in their ability to manipulate multiple objects simultaneously and efficiently within fluids, particularly in microfluidic systems, due to constraints like the need for differential refractive indices, high costs, and limited control over fluid flow and particle trajectories.

Innovation Solution

A microfluidic device with multiple actuators and sensors that create force fields to manipulate objects by determining and applying corresponding force fields to each object, allowing for independent control of their trajectories and distribution within the fluid.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If optical tweezers are used to manipulate particles, then particle manipulation capability is improved, but equipment size and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle manipulation capabilityVSAvoidequipment size and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces optical tweezers (optical system) with electrostatic actuators that generate electric fields to manipulate particles. This substitution eliminates the need for complex optical components including lasers, microscopes, and focusing optics, thereby reducing equipment size and cost while maintaining particle manipulation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the manipulation parameter from optical properties (refractive index difference) to electrical properties (charge/size ratio). By using electric fields instead of optical fields, the system achieves particle manipulation through Coulomb forces and dielectrophoresis, fundamentally altering the physical parameter basis for control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If electrophoresis is used to sort particles, then sorting capability is improved, but control flexibility over trajectories deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting capabilityVSAvoidtrajectory control flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs multiple independently controlled electrostatic actuators that can dynamically adjust electric field distributions in real-time. This allows particles to be steered along arbitrary trajectories by dynamically reconfiguring the electric field, rather than being constrained to fixed paths as in traditional electrophoresis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The electrostatic actuator array serves multiple functions: it can sort particles by charge/size ratio, steer particles along arbitrary trajectories, manipulate fluid flow, and perform multiple sorting operations simultaneously. This multi-functionality replaces the single-purpose nature of conventional electrophoresis systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If optical tweezers are used to manipulate objects, then manipulation precision is improved, but ability to redistribute fluids deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanipulation precisionVSAvoidfluid redistribution capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces electrostatic fields as an intermediary mechanism that couples particle manipulation with fluid control. By applying electric fields to charged or polarizable particles suspended in conductive fluids, the system can simultaneously manipulate particle positions and induce fluid flow through electroosmotic effects, enabling coordinated control that optical tweezers cannot achieve

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise and simultaneous control of multiple objects within a fluid, overcoming limitations of existing methods by providing arbitrary trajectory control and efficient sorting, mixing, and redistribution of fluids and particles.

Implementation Method 1

A plurality of actuators installed thereon for creating a force field within the microfluidic device. The force field respectively imparts a corresponding force on each of the objects.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce field: Force

Implementation Method 2

A plurality of fluid flow fields defining the fluid flow responsive to a set of actuation signals is determined for the microfluidic receptacle. The method then determines, at each sampling interval, a destination point on a trajectory corresponding to each particle.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow: Convection

Implementation Method 3

A sensor for determining at least the location of each object therein.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDetection:

Data Source

PatentUS7651598B2Arbitrary and simultaneous control of multiple objects in microfluidic systems
Publication Date: 2010.01.26 UNIV OF MARYLAND
  • US7651598B2 patent drawing
  • US7651598B2 patent drawing
  • US7651598B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a microfluidic device, respective motion of a plurality of objects along corresponding trajectories is achieved by determining a force field, such as an underlying fluid flow which, when applied to the plurality of object, moves each object along its corresponding trajectory. The force field is a linear superposition of a subset of all force fields supported by the physical characteristics of the microfluidic device. Once the fields have been ascertained, a plurality of actuation signals corresponding to the fields is applied to actuators installed on the microfluidic device to cause the force on each object. By implementing a feedback structure, corrections for positional errors may be made by computing a corrective force for each object and adjusting the actuation signals appropriately thereto.