Microfluidic Actuator Cross-talk Reduction via Support Member Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In micro-fluidic devices, such as printheads, mechanical cross-talk between actuators and parasitic forces due to support members can lead to inefficiencies in ink ejection, requiring complex normalization processes and increased costs as the number of nozzles increases, and can result in actuator damage from cyclic stresses.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced to remove a support member from the electrical contact pad coupled to an actuator electrode using conductive adhesive, reducing mechanical cross-talk by laser ablation, which decouples actuators and minimizes parasitic forces, thereby standardizing actuation voltages and reducing structural variations across ink jets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If support members are used to mount electrical contact pads, then electrical connections are established, but mechanical cross-talk between actuators increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical connection stabilityVSAvoidmechanical cross-talk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the support member from the region above the electrical contact pad and actuator, extracting the source of mechanical cross-talk while preserving electrical connectivity through the conductive adhesive and extended contact pad structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The support member is selectively removed in specific regions (above contact pads and actuators) while potentially remaining in other areas, segmenting its presence to eliminate harmful mechanical coupling while maintaining structural support where needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If support members cover electrical contact pads and actuators, then structural support is provided, but parasitic forces increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidparasitic forces
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The support member is extracted from the critical region above the actuator and contact pad, eliminating the transmission path for parasitic forces while maintaining structural integrity through alternative support configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of manufacture

If actuators are mechanically coupled through support members, then assembly is simplified, but actuator performance varies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidactuator performance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical coupling path through the support member is removed, decoupling actuator performance while maintaining electrical connectivity, thereby improving performance consistency without significantly complicating the assembly process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces mechanical cross-talk, decreases the variability in actuation voltages, and minimizes the risk of actuator damage, leading to more uniform ink jet performance and reduced operational costs by standardizing the ink jet stack structure.

Implementation Method 1

A method is introduced to remove a support member from the electrical contact pad coupled to an actuator electrode using laser ablation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 2

piezoelectric materials, such as lead-zirconium-titanate (PZT), may be sandwiched between two electrodes. In response to one of the electrodes receiving an electrical signal, an electrical field is established between the two electrodes and the PZT material physically moves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS7780266B2Micro-fluidic device having reduced mechanical cross-talk and method for making the micro-fluidic device
Publication Date: 2010.08.24 XEROX CORP
  • US7780266B2 patent drawing
  • US7780266B2 patent drawing
  • US7780266B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method processes electrical connections in a micro-fluidic device to reduce mechanical cross-talk and improve actuator performance. The method includes applying conductive adhesive to an electrode overlying a piezoelectric material, contacting the conductive adhesive with an electrical contact pad mounted to a support member to cover the electrode and piezoelectric material with the support member, and removing a portion of the support member that covers the electrical contact pad, the electrode, and the actuator.