Microfluidic Device Additive Reagent Delivery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current microfluidic devices face challenges in performing multiple reaction steps with minimal cross-contamination and efficient delivery of reagents in small, isolated hydrophobic surface devices, particularly in maintaining the integrity of samples like eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells during multiplex reactions.

Innovation Solution

A microfluidic device comprising two plates with hydrophobic surfaces, where loading channels align with channel-loaded loading wells to allow for additive delivery of reagents, minimizing cross-contamination through precise alignment and sliding mechanisms, enabling efficient biochemical reactions and nucleic acid processing without intermediate clean-ups.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple reaction steps are performed in small isolated chambers, then sample compartmentalization and reaction efficiency are improved, but cross-contamination between steps increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction efficiencyVSAvoidcross-contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device divides the reaction system into multiple isolated chambers or wells, each capable of performing specific reaction steps independently. This segmentation prevents cross-contamination between different reactions while maintaining efficient use of small sample volumes in each compartment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Reagents are pre-loaded into the isolated chambers before the reaction sequence begins. This preliminary action allows for controlled addition of reagents at specific time points without requiring open handling, thereby preventing cross-contamination while maintaining reaction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of substance

If reagents are delivered efficiently in small volumes, then material loss is reduced, but delivery precision and control become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial lossVSAvoiddelivery precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The device replaces manual or complex mechanical reagent delivery systems with passive micropipetting or capillary-driven delivery mechanisms integrated into the microfluidic structure. This substitution enables precise control of small volumes through geometric design and surface tension effects, reducing material loss while maintaining delivery precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The device utilizes changes in physical parameters such as pressure gradients, temperature, or fluid flow rates to control reagent delivery. By adjusting these parameters, precise volumetric control is achieved without requiring complex mechanical positioning, thereby reducing material loss while maintaining delivery precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If hydrophobic surfaces are used throughout the device, then ease of cleaning and reagent compatibility are improved, but wetting and distribution of aqueous reagents become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning easeVSAvoidreagent distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device incorporates localized hydrophilic regions or treatments in specific areas where aqueous reagent distribution is required, while maintaining hydrophobic surfaces elsewhere for ease of cleaning and reagent compatibility. This local quality differentiation enables effective reagent distribution in reaction chambers while preserving the cleaning advantages of hydrophobic surfaces in channels and reservoirs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device allows for efficient multiplex reactions with reduced material loss and cross-contamination, facilitating the analysis of nucleic acids from single cells and various samples, including eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells, with precise control over reagent delivery and reaction conditions.

Implementation Method 1

both the first surface and the second surface being hydrophobic

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobicity: Hydrophobe

Implementation Method 2

additive delivery of reagents

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Data Source

PatentUS12122996B2Device for additive delivery of reagents and related methods and systems
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH
  • US12122996B2 patent drawing
  • US12122996B2 patent drawing
  • US12122996B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for allowing compartmentalized reactions with minimized cross-contamination between the compartments, utilizing a delivery of material by loading wells to pooling wells, such that the pooling wells can be additively provided with reactants while maintaining isolation between the pooling wells. The use of geometric properties is used to facilitate transmission of fluids/droplets without the need for hydrophilic surfaces.