Automated Microfluidic Bacterial Counting via Pixel Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The labor-intensive process of repeatedly observing and counting target bacteria in microfluidic devices to assess their response to antimicrobial agents is burdensome, especially when dealing with multiple devices, as current methods require manual counting and shape verification under a microscope.

Innovation Solution

A microfluidic-device observation apparatus and method that utilize an imaging unit, extraction pixel selection, flow path identification, specimen-featured-pixel detection, and statistical feature value calculation to automatically acquire and analyze images of microfluidic devices, allowing for the easy determination of bacterial number and shape within flow paths without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual observation and counting of target bacteria is performed repeatedly under a microscope, then measurement precision of bacterial states is improved, but loss of time and productivity deteriorate due to labor-intensive operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacterial state assessment accuracyVSAvoidobservation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical observation process with an automated image processing system. The imaging unit captures images of the microfluidic device, and the control unit automatically processes these images to detect and count target bacteria, substituting the manual microscope observation and counting process with automated optical imaging and computational analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service automation where the control unit independently performs image processing, bacterial detection, counting, and shape analysis without requiring continuous manual intervention. The automated system processes images and generates bacterial state assessments autonomously, freeing operators from repetitive manual counting tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If multiple microfluidic devices are examined to assess bacterial susceptibility, then reliability of susceptibility assessment is improved, but loss of time and operational complexity worsen due to processing multiple devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesusceptibility assessment reliabilityVSAvoidtotal observation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the observation processes for multiple microfluidic devices into a unified automated system. The imaging unit can capture images of multiple devices, and the control unit processes all images through the same automated analysis pipeline, combining what would be separate manual observation tasks into a single integrated workflow that reduces total processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated observation system provides multi-functionality by handling various aspects of bacterial susceptibility assessment simultaneously - imaging, detection, counting, shape analysis, and susceptibility determination - making the system universally applicable to multiple devices and multiple bacterial samples in a single operational sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If manual counting and shape verification of target bacteria is performed, then measurement precision of bacterial number and shape is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to burdensome manual procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacterial count and shape accuracyVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual counting and shape verification operations with automated image processing algorithms. The control unit automatically detects bacterial positions, counts individual bacteria, and analyzes their shapes from captured images, substituting the manual microscopic examination and measurement process with computational image analysis that maintains precision while simplifying operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12140743B2Microfluidic device observation device and microfluidic device observation method
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 SHIMADZU CORP
  • US12140743B2 patent drawing
  • US12140743B2 patent drawing
  • US12140743B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A microfluidic-device observation apparatus 1 for observing a specimen present in a plurality of flow paths 103a to 103e arranged in a microfluidic device 100 is provided with: an imaging unit 4 configured to acquire an image of the microfluidic device 100; an extraction pixel selection unit 21 configured to select extraction pixels from a plurality of pixels by a certain criterion based on luminance values of the plurality of pixels constituting the acquired image; a flow path identification unit 22 configured to locate the plurality of flow paths 103a to 103e included in the image; a specimen-featured-pixels detection unit 24 configured to detect a certain number or more of extraction pixels consecutively present inside of the identified plurality of flow paths 103a to 103e as a specimen-featured-pixels group; and a statistical feature value calculation unit 26 configured to calculate a statistical feature value of the specimen based on the number of specimen-featured-pixels group and/or the number of the extraction pixels constituting each of the specimen-featured-pixels group.