Microfluidic Cartridge for Spatial Single-Cell Encoding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for preparing single-cell suspensions and libraries from solid tissues are manual, labor-intensive, and lack process integration, leading to variability in quality and scalability issues for single-cell sequencing applications.

Innovation Solution

A novel high-throughput spatial system that automates the sample preparation of cells or nuclei from tissue using a disposable cartridge with microvalves, enabling the collection and encoding of single cells or nuclei with spatial barcodes for NGS and MS analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual methods are used to prepare single-cell suspensions from solid tissues, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but labor intensity increases and process integration is lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of sample preparationVSAvoidcomplexity of processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the tissue processing into discrete microregion units that can be independently handled by microvalves and microfluidic channels. Each microregion represents a separatable segment of tissue that can be processed individually, enabling automated handling while maintaining modularity in the system design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The processing system integrates multiple functions including tissue dissociation, single-cell suspension generation, spatial barcode encoding, and library preparation into a single unified platform. The microvalve array and microfluidic network serve multiple purposes: controlling fluid flow, isolating microregions, and enabling combinatorial encoding operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If manual processing is used, then device complexity remains low, but processing time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput of single-cell library preparationVSAvoidprocessing time for tissue to single-cell suspension
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables continuous processing of multiple tissue microregions through the automated microvalve control system. Rather than manual batch processing, the microfluidic platform continuously flows reagents through defined microregion paths, maintaining continuous useful action throughout the sample preparation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary spatial encoding of microregions with combinatorial barcodes during the initial processing stages. This preliminary action of encoding spatial information before downstream analysis eliminates the need for subsequent manual mapping and significantly reduces total processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If manual methods are employed, then equipment requirements are minimal, but variability in quality increases and consistency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality consistency of single-cell librariesVSAvoidcomplexity of automated processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms through the microvalve array that monitors and adjusts fluid flow, pressure, and timing parameters during processing. This closed-loop control ensures consistent dissociation conditions and uniform spatial encoding across all microregions, eliminating manual variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system precisely controls critical parameters including microregion size, dissociation time, reagent concentration, and flow rates. By maintaining these parameters within defined ranges through automated regulation, the system produces consistent quality output across multiple samples and processing runs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If traditional processing is used, then scalability is limited, but the system remains simple and manageable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescalability of single-cell sequencing workflowVSAvoidoperational simplicity of processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system adds the dimension of spatial encoding through combinatorial barcodes that encode three-dimensional microregion coordinates. This dimensional encoding capability enables scalable processing of large tissue volumes while maintaining the ability to track and analyze individual microregion origins through computational decoding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces spatial barcodes as an intermediary layer between physical tissue microregions and downstream sequencing analysis. These barcodes mediate the connection between spatial position and genetic data, enabling scalable processing while simplifying operational workflow through automated barcode assignment and tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250187012A1Method and apparatus for processing tissue and other samples encoding cellular spatial position information with combinatorial encoding
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 SILICON VALLEY SCI
  • US20250187012A1 patent drawing
  • US20250187012A1 patent drawing
  • US20250187012A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein is a spatial sampling system that encodes samples with spatial barcodes that identify original spatial position of a microsample within a biological specimen or from different voxels from a biological sample. The method provides cell/nuclei-level resolution of cells and nuclei within microsamples. The method can comprise tagging cells and or nuclei in each microsample or voxel with a first barcode that encodes the original spatial position of the microsample in the biological specimen or the different voxel in the biological sample; pooling tagged microsamples; dividing the pooled sample into a plurality of subsamples, such that a plurality of subsamples comprise cells and/or nuclei from different original microsamples or voxels.