Microfluidic Chip Production via Plasma Surface Activation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current microfluidic chip production methods face challenges such as hydrophobic surface issues with PDMS, inefficient protein coating, and difficulties in scalable and repeatable protein binding, leading to reduced sensitivity and increased production costs.

Innovation Solution

A microfluidic production process involving 3D designed chip components, surface activation with sodium hydroxide and glutaraldehyde, protein coating with diffuser humidification, and closure using double-sided tape to ensure precise protein placement and efficient chip assembly, enabling mass production with improved sensitivity and reduced costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If PDMS material is used for microfluidic chip production, then flexibility and ease of manufacturing are improved, but hydrophobic surface issues reduce protein coating efficiency and sensitivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidsensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies plasma treatment to change the surface parameters of PDMS material, transforming it from hydrophobic to hydrophilic. This modifies the surface energy and wetting properties, enabling efficient protein coating while maintaining the bulk properties and manufacturability of PDMS.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure by combining PDMS bulk material with a plasma-treated surface layer. This composite approach maintains the ease of manufacture and flexibility of PDMS while adding the hydrophilic properties needed for effective protein binding, resolving the contradiction between manufacturability and sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Device complexity

If conventional protein coating methods are used, then simplicity of process is maintained, but protein binding is not scalable and repeatable leading to increased production costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess complexityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs plasma treatment and protein coating in a sequential automated manner where the surface preparation is done in advance before protein binding. This preliminary action ensures consistent surface properties that enable scalable and repeatable protein coating processes, improving production efficiency while maintaining reasonable process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical protein coating methods with an automated system that uses controlled fluid delivery and environmental conditions. This substitution enables precise, repeatable protein binding at scale, increasing productivity without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If ELISA testing with 96 wells is used, then comprehensive testing capability is achieved, but response time exceeds one hour and cannot be used for POCT

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting capabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the testing function into a microfluidic chip format with integrated channels and reservoirs, allowing parallel processing of multiple samples in a compact format. This segmentation enables rapid analysis while maintaining the ability to test multiple parameters, reducing response time from over an hour to minutes while preserving comprehensive testing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process allows for controlled surface geometry and function, efficient protein coating, and scalable production of microfluidic chips with enhanced sensitivity and lower unit prices, addressing the limitations of existing methods.

Implementation Method 1

Activation of the bottom chip surfaces with sodium hydroxide solution by immersing them into a secondary immersion tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface activation: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

The second modification of the bottom chip surfaces with glutaraldehyde solution by immersing them into a fourth immersion tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface modification: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

The first modification of the bottom chip surfaces with Polyethyleneimine solution by immersing them into a third immersion tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProtein coating: Adsorption

Implementation Method 4

Incubating the bottom chips on which the protein solution is dripped, within an incubator system with diffuser humidification which provides humidity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHumidification: Evaporation

Implementation Method 5

closure using double-sided tape to ensure precise protein placement and efficient chip assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS20240216910A1Microfluidic chip and its production
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 TAIGA BIYOTEKNOLOJI LTD ŞIRKETI
  • US20240216910A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention is concerned with the production process of a microfluidic chip developed to identify antibodies and proteins, as well as cellular types, viruses and bacteria in the blood to be used in the medical device industry.