Microfluidic Drop Formation via Surface Tension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing devices for forming microdrops and nanodrops in microfluidic circuits face challenges such as precise adjustment of fluid flow rates, contamination, evaporation, and the need for costly forcing means, making them difficult to implement and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A device that utilizes surface tension forces within a microfluidic chamber to form drops, where a second fluid is subjected to a surface energy gradient and capillary forces, allowing for drop formation without the need for fluid circulation, with drop size determined by geometric parameters rather than flow rates or fluid properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If forcing means such as pumps are used to circulate fluids, then drop formation can be controlled, but device complexity and operational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrop formation controlVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device uses the inherent surface tension and capillary forces of the fluids themselves to drive drop formation and transport, without external pumps. The immiscible fluids automatically segregate and move through the microchannel network based on their interfacial properties, making the system self-powered and eliminating complex forcing means

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical pumping systems with surface tension-driven capillary flow. Instead of using mechanical force from pumps to move fluids and form drops, the system exploits the natural capillary pressure differences arising from surface tension at the fluid interfaces, substituting a complex mechanical system with a passive physicochemical mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If flow rates are precisely adjusted to control drop size, then manufacturing precision improves, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrop size controlVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the controlling parameter for drop size from flow rate (which requires precise adjustment) to geometric parameters of the microchannel (such as channel width, height, and length ratios). By making drop size dependent on fixed geometric dimensions rather than variable flow rates, the system achieves precise control while simplifying operation, as the geometry can be manufactured with standard tolerances without requiring complex flow control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If conventional drop formation methods are used, then drops can be formed, but contamination and evaporation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrop formationVSAvoidcontamination and evaporation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device uses an immiscible carrier fluid (such as oil) as the continuous phase in which drops are formed and transported. This carrier fluid creates a protective environment around the dispersed phase drops, isolating them from direct contact with air and preventing both contamination from external sources and evaporation of the drop contents, while still allowing efficient drop formation through interfacial tension mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the formation of drops with precise and controlled size, independent of fluid flow rates and properties, reducing contamination risks and operational costs, and allowing for flexible chamber geometries and surface tension modifications to adjust drop size.

Implementation Method 1

the second fluid is subjected, at the outlet of the microchannel into the chamber, to two antagonistic forces, due to the surface tension

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface tension: Surface Tension

Implementation Method 2

A second force, acting in the opposite direction to the first and corresponding to the capillary force, tends to maintain the finger of second fluid attached to the second fluid contained in the microchannel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary force: Capillary Action

Data Source

PatentEP3549905B1Device for forming drops in a microfluidic circuit
Publication Date: 2021.11.03 CENT NAT DE LA RECH SCI (C N R S)
  • EP3549905B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3549905B1 patent drawingFigure 4~8
  • EP3549905B1 patent drawingFigure 9~10

AI summary

The invention relates to a device (1) for forming droplets (14) in a microfluidic circuit, characterized in that it comprises: - a chamber (3) containing a first fluid and delimited by two opposing walls (10, 11) which diverge from each other in at least one given direction, and - a plurality of microchannels (8) which each contain a second fluid and which open through an outlet (13) into said chamber (3) upstream of the chamber with respect to the given direction, the outlet (13) of each microchannel (8) into the chamber (3) comprising an increase in the cross-section of the passage of the second fluid and this increase causing the formation of droplets (14) of the second fluid and their detachment from the second fluid contained in the microchannel, independently of the flow of the first fluid and/or the second fluid.