Microfluidic Droplet Injection Using Self-Balanced Pressure Drop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing microfluidic pico-injectors require precise and expensive pressure control to deliver droplets of a first fluid into a second fluid, making them costly and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A microfluidic apparatus with a controlled system that uses a relative pressure drop to create a balance condition, allowing for the release of a controlled volume of a first fluid into a main channel without the need for fine pressure control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If precise pressure control is used to deliver droplets in microfluidic systems, then droplet delivery accuracy is improved, but system cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedroplet delivery accuracyVSAvoidpressure control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the natural flow of the carrier fluid to automatically create the pressure balance condition. The relative pressure drop along the main channel self-regulates the meniscus position without requiring external pressure control mechanisms. The system serves itself by utilizing the inherent hydraulic resistance of the channel geometry to maintain the balance condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs hydraulic principles by using the carrier fluid flow to generate a relative pressure drop between two points in the auxiliary channel. This pressure difference is used to control the position of the meniscus and trigger droplet release, replacing complex mechanical or electronic pressure control systems with a purely hydraulic solution based on channel geometry and flow rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Manufacturing precision

If expensive high accuracy pumps are used for pressure control, then droplet release precision is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedroplet release precisionVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces expensive, high-precision pumps with simple, low-cost microchannel geometry and flow control. The pressure control function is achieved through the inherent hydraulic resistance of the channel design rather than through costly active pressure control components, making the system much more cost-effective while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameter from absolute pressure control to relative pressure drop. By controlling the flow rate of the carrier fluid and designing the channel geometry to create a specific pressure gradient, the system achieves precise droplet release without requiring expensive high-accuracy pressure control equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If fine pressure control mechanisms are implemented, then droplet injection reliability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedroplet injection reliabilityVSAvoidelectricity consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the kinetic energy of the flowing carrier fluid to automatically maintain the pressure balance condition. No additional energy is required for pressure control as the system harnesses the energy already present in the flowing carrier fluid to position the meniscus and trigger droplet release when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses hydraulic flow to control droplet release, replacing energy-intensive electronic pressure control systems. The relative pressure drop created by the carrier fluid flow through the microchannel geometry provides reliable droplet injection control without requiring continuous energy input from pumps or pressure regulators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Adaptability or versatility

If the microfluidic chip size is reduced for scalability, then system scalability is improved, but pressure control precision becomes more difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem scalabilityVSAvoidpressure control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from controlling absolute pressure to controlling relative pressure drop, which scales better with miniaturization. The pressure balance condition depends on the ratio of hydraulic resistances in different channel segments, which can be maintained through geometric scaling rather than requiring precise absolute pressure control that becomes increasingly difficult at smaller scales.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

By using hydraulic resistance ratios determined by channel geometry rather than absolute pressure values, the system achieves scalability. The relative pressure drop method allows the same control mechanism to work across different scales by simply adjusting channel dimensions proportionally, maintaining precision without requiring increasingly sophisticated pressure control as the system is miniaturized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system is cost-effective, scalable, and energy-efficient, allowing for precise and reproducible delivery of the first fluid, with no active components required for operation.

Implementation Method 1

a flow of the carrier fluid induces a difference of pressure between the first and second orifice generating a balance condition such that a meniscus of the second fluid interface is maintained in the auxiliary channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

the first fluid interface and the second fluid interface are configured to satisfy the following inequality wherein γ corresponds to an interfacial tension between the first fluid and the carrier fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterfacial tension: Surface Tension

Implementation Method 3

the passage of drops between the first intersection and the second intersection generates a disturbance which means that the system has moved away from the balance condition. Under the condition of a disturbance large enough, there is a release of a volume (e.g. droplet) of the first fluid into the main channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS12239985B2System and apparatus for injecting droplets in a microfluidic system
Publication Date: 2025.03.04 WITHINGS SAS
  • US12239985B2 patent drawing
  • US12239985B2 patent drawing
  • US12239985B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A microfluidic apparatus for delivering droplets of a first fluid to droplets of a second fluid, comprising a main channel, with a carrier fluid carrying droplets of the second fluid, an auxiliary channel, fluidly coupled to the main channel at a first intersection via a first orifice with a first fluid interface, and at a second intersection downstream to the first intersection via a second orifice with a second fluid interface, wherein a flow of the carrier fluid induces a difference of pressure between the first and second orifice generating a balance condition such that a meniscus of the second fluid interface is maintained in the auxiliary channel, at the vicinity of the second orifice, wherein a balance deviation triggers a release of a volume of the first fluid from the second fluid interface into the main channel.