Microfluidic Gradient Mixing for Nanocrystal Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Protein crystallography, particularly in serial femtosecond crystallography, faces challenges in identifying and characterizing nanocrystal growth conditions due to the difficulty in obtaining small, uniform protein crystals, especially for large protein complexes like membrane proteins, where sample retrieval and amount are critical.

Innovation Solution

A microfluidic crystallization apparatus utilizing gradient mixing in nanowell arrays allows for parallel high-throughput experiments with controlled mixing and sealing of analyte and precipitant solutions, minimizing sample consumption and enabling efficient crystallization screening by establishing hundreds of unique concentrations within nanoliter wells.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional crystallization methods are used, then crystal growth can occur, but sample consumption is high and throughput is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystallization throughputVSAvoidsample consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the crystallization process into multiple parallel nanowell reactions, each containing segmented volumes of analyte and precipitant solutions. This segmentation enables simultaneous screening of numerous conditions with minimal sample volume per well, achieving high throughput while reducing overall sample consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from traditional single-well or low-throughput methods to a high-dimensional parallel array format. By arranging hundreds of nanowells in a grid pattern and using gradient mixing to create concentration gradients across multiple dimensions, the system achieves exponential increases in screening capacity without proportionally increasing sample consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If sample amount is increased to improve crystal quality, then diffraction data quality improves, but sample availability is limited especially for membrane proteins

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediffraction data qualityVSAvoidsample amount
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates locally optimized crystallization conditions in each nanowell through gradient mixing, where concentration gradients provide a range of conditions from dilute to concentrated. This local quality variation allows identification of optimal conditions for nanocrystal growth without requiring large sample amounts, as each well experiences a spectrum of conditions simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention systematically varies crystallization parameters (concentrations, pH, temperature) across the nanowell array using gradient mixing. By creating hundreds of unique concentration combinations through controlled mixing of analyte and precipitant solutions, the system identifies optimal parameters for nanocrystal formation that yield high-quality diffraction data from minimal sample.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If parallel high-throughput experiments are conducted, then screening efficiency increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening efficiencyVSAvoidapparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The microfluidic device integrates multiple functions into a single platform: gradient generation, parallel sample mixing, nanowell filling, and crystal imaging. The gradient mixing chamber and nanowell array work together to simultaneously perform hundreds of crystallization experiments with different conditions, while the integrated imaging system monitors all wells without requiring sample retrieval, achieving high screening efficiency with a unified device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-regulating mechanisms such as passive gradient mixing through diffusion and laminar flow, where the fluid dynamics automatically create concentration gradients without active pumping or complex control systems. The nanowells self-fill and seal, and crystals grow undisturbed within the sealed wells, reducing the need for complex intervention mechanisms while maintaining high throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If nanowells are sealed to prevent contamination and evaporation, then crystal growth quality improves, but interference from adjacent wells must be eliminated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystal growth stabilityVSAvoidadjacent well interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts or removes the harmful factor of adjacent well interference by implementing physical separation mechanisms. The nanowell array design includes isolation structures such as hydrophobic barriers or physical walls between wells that prevent cross-contamination while maintaining the sealed environment necessary for stable crystal growth. This extraction of the interference problem allows simultaneous sealed cultivation of multiple samples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach facilitates rapid and efficient crystallization screening with minimal sample usage, allows for precise control of conditions, and enables direct imaging of crystals within the apparatus, reducing contamination and evaporation risks, while enabling the identification of optimal crystallization conditions for further scaling.

Implementation Method 1

The array design and integrated valves further permit filling and mixing of analyte solution and precipitant under laminar flow conditions initiated through suction or pressure pumping, for example

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaminar flow: Laminar Flow

Implementation Method 2

filling and mixing of analyte solution and precipitant under laminar flow conditions initiated through suction or pressure pumping, for example

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Implementation Method 3

filling and mixing of analyte solution and precipitant under laminar flow conditions initiated through suction or pressure pumping, for example

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure pumping: Pump

Implementation Method 4

the compartments may be isolated by elastomeric 'doormat valve' sealing via a membrane, for example

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10722889B2Methods, systems and apparatus for microfluidic crystallization based on gradient mixing
Publication Date: 2020.07.28 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US10722889B2 patent drawing
  • US10722889B2 patent drawing
  • US10722889B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A microfluidic apparatus, systems and methods for microfluidic crystallization based on gradient mixing. In one embodiment, the apparatus includes (a) a first layer, (b) a plurality of first channels and a plurality of vacuum chambers both arranged in the first layer, where the plurality of vacuum chambers are each coupled to at least one of the first channels, (c) a membrane having first and second surfaces, where the first surface of the membrane is coupled to the first layer, (d) a second layer coupled to the second surface of the membrane, (e) a plurality of wells and a plurality of second channels both arranged in the second layer, where the wells are each coupled to at least one of the plurality of second channels and (f) a plurality of barrier walls each disposed in the plurality of second channels and arranged opposite to one of the plurality of vacuum chambers.