Microfluidic Magnetic Separation with Removable Substrates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for separating magnetically labeled particles from fluids face challenges such as low capture efficiency, low purity, inability to recover viable cells, limited enumeration and imaging capabilities, inflexibility in customization, long run times, and poor compatibility with automation and parallel sample processing.

Innovation Solution

The use of microfluidic devices that combine magnetic, gravitational, and inertial forces for separation, with removable substrates for cell collection and imaging, enabling high-purity and high-efficiency separation of magnetically labeled particles into small volumes, and allowing for single-cell analysis and automation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If external magnets are used to magnetize structures in microscale devices to amplify field gradient, then magnetic separation capability is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic separation capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical magnetic amplification structures with a simplified approach using permanent magnets positioned near the microfluidic device. This substitution maintains effective magnetic field gradients while significantly reducing device complexity and manufacturing difficulty by eliminating the need for integrated magnetizable structures within the microdevice itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If magnetic beads are bound to target cells for separation, then capture efficiency is improved, but cell viability and purity deteriorate due to inability to recover viable cells

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapture efficiencyVSAvoidcell viability loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables recovery of viable target cells by implementing a two-stage process: first, magnetic beads are used to capture target cells with high efficiency; second, the captured cells are released from the magnetic beads and recovered in a viable state. This allows both high capture efficiency and cell viability to be achieved, as the cells can be separated from the magnetic beads after the separation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Quantity of substance

If macrofluidic systems are used for cell separation, then processing volume is improved, but enumeration and imaging precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing volumeVSAvoidenumeration and imaging precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from macrofluidic to microfluidic systems, utilizing the microscale dimension to achieve both adequate processing volume and high measurement precision. The microfluidic channels confine cells in a restricted spatial environment, enabling precise enumeration and high-resolution imaging while maintaining sufficient sample throughput for practical applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Device complexity

If multiple samples are processed sequentially in existing systems, then device simplicity is maintained, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice simplicityVSAvoidsample processing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements parallel processing capability by dividing the microfluidic system into multiple independent channels or modules that can process multiple samples simultaneously. This segmentation allows high productivity through parallel operation while maintaining relative device simplicity, as each channel can be designed using standardized components and the overall system architecture remains manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances capture efficiency, purity, and recovery of viable cells, enables precise enumeration and imaging, allows for customization, and facilitates rapid and automated processing of multiple samples, improving the accuracy of genetic and proteomic analysis.

Implementation Method 1

separating a plurality of particles having magnetic labels from a fluid using a magnetic force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

combine magnetic, gravitational, and inertial forces for separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational force: Gravitation

Implementation Method 3

combine magnetic, gravitational, and inertial forces for separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial force: Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS10240186B2Devices, systems, and methods for magnetic separation
Publication Date: 2019.03.26 LIQUIDBIO LLC
  • US10240186B2 patent drawing
  • US10240186B2 patent drawing
  • US10240186B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, microfluidic devices, and instruments for magnetic separation of particles from a fluid are described. Examples include microfluidic devices having a removable portion. Examples include microfluidic devices having one or more regions of reduced fluid velocity. Examples further including instruments having pneumatic interfaces. Examples further includes instruments having controllable magnets, imaging components, or combinations thereof.