Microfluidic Particle Separation with Integrated Inertial Pump

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microfluidic devices face challenges in efficiently separating and concentrating particles due to the complexity and potential failure of external sensors and pumps, which can slow down fluid flow and increase costs.

Innovation Solution

The integration of passive separation structures, such as arrays of columns, with inertial pumps within the microfluidic device to direct particles based on size, allowing for efficient separation and concentration without external pumps, and the use of integrated pumps to facilitate flow and direct separated particles to a drop-on-demand outlet.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If external sensors and pumps are used to separate particles, then particle separation can be achieved, but device complexity and potential failure points increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes external pumps and sensors from the system, extracting the problematic components that caused complexity and reliability issues. The microfluidic device uses passive separation structures and integrated inertial pumps only, eliminating external control systems entirely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs particle separation autonomously using inertial forces and passive structures without external control. The integrated pump generates flow through inertial mechanisms within the device itself, and particles are separated by their own physical properties (size, density) interacting with the separation structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If external pumps are used to facilitate fluid flow, then flow can be controlled, but cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow controlVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the pumping function directly into the microfluidic device by integrating inertial pumps within the chip structure. This combines flow generation and particle separation functions into a single integrated system, eliminating the need for separate external pumps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces external mechanical pump systems with an integrated inertial pump mechanism that uses fluid inertia and passive structures to generate flow. This substitutes complex external mechanical control with a simpler integrated physical mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If external pumps are used for particle separation, then separation can be achieved, but flow speed decreases and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidflow speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fluid flow into distinct paths using passive separation structures (columns, channels) that direct particles of different sizes along different trajectories. This segmentation enables simultaneous separation and maintains flow speed by avoiding the bottlenecks of external pump connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a compact, efficient system for particle separation and concentration, reducing complexity and cost by eliminating the need for external pumps and ensuring consistent flow, while enabling precise sorting and storage of particles.

Implementation Method 1

directing each particle from an input channel through a chamber of passive separation structures... that direct particles based on size

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial forces: Inertia

Implementation Method 2

The device includes at least one integrated pump, such as an inertial pump, in the input channel or an output channel to facilitate flow of the particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial pumping: Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS11229912B2Particle separation
Publication Date: 2022.01.25 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US11229912B2 patent drawing
  • US11229912B2 patent drawing
  • US11229912B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example system includes an input channel having a first end and a second end to receive particles through the first end, a separation chamber, at least two output channels, and an integrated pump to facilitate flow through the separation chamber. The separation chamber is in fluid communication with the second end of the input channel. The separation chamber has a passive separation structure, the passive separation structure including an array of columns spaced apart to facilitate separation of particles in a flow based on a size of the particles. Each output channel is in fluid communication with the separation chamber to receive separated particles. The integrated pump is positioned within at least one of the input channel or one of the at least two output channels.