Modular Microfluidic Reaction Circuits for Low-Loss NGS Sample Prep

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current microfluidic technologies face bottlenecks in sample preparation for next-generation sequencing (NGS) due to high costs and increasing complexity, with sequence readout costs decoupling from sample preparation costs, leading to sample-prep-limited applications if robust technologies are not developed.

Innovation Solution

Microfluidic devices with modular reaction circuits and programmable valve systems that allow for efficient reagent handling, mixing, and filtering, along with a controller system for pressure regulation and closed-loop tuning, enabling low-cost genomic and epigenetic sample preparation with minimal sample loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If traditional sample preparation methods are used for NGS, then sample preparation costs remain high (several hundred dollars per sample), but sequence readout costs have dropped below $1000 per sample, creating a cost imbalance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample preparation costVSAvoidsample throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The microfluidic device is divided into multiple reaction modules (e.g., 96 modules) that can operate independently and in parallel. Each module contains its own reaction circuits, allowing simultaneous processing of multiple samples, thereby increasing throughput while reducing per-sample preparation costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reaction modules are designed to be multi-functional, capable of performing various sample preparation steps (lysis, tagging, enrichment, etc.) within the same module. This universality reduces the need for separate dedicated equipment for each step, lowering overall costs while maintaining high throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If more reaction modules are added to increase throughput, then device complexity increases with multiple flow channels and valves, but sample loss must be minimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample throughputVSAvoidmicrofluidic circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device is segmented into identical or similar reaction modules that replicate the same functional circuit design. This modular segmentation allows throughput scaling without proportionally increasing overall system complexity, as each module is a self-contained unit with standardized components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple reaction modules are connected through a shared fluidic network with common reservoirs and waste collection points. This merging of certain functions (reservoirs, waste handling) across modules reduces the total number of individual components needed, managing complexity while maintaining high throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If sample preparation protocols are made more complex to handle diverse NGS applications, then sample preparation capability improves, but sample loss and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample preparation capabilityVSAvoidsample loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Each reaction module is designed as a universal platform that can perform multiple sample preparation functions (cell lysis, DNA/RNA extraction, library preparation, enrichment) within the same physical module. This allows diverse NGS applications to be handled without increasing sample loss, as all functions occur in closed, controlled environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The microfluidic system enables continuous processing of samples through automated fluid handling and sequential reaction steps without manual intervention between steps. This continuity minimizes sample transfer operations that could cause loss, while maintaining the ability to handle complex preparation protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly reduces sample preparation costs and increases throughput by minimizing sample loss and optimizing fluid pathways, addressing the limitations of existing technologies and enabling efficient processing of biological samples for NGS.

Implementation Method 1

The valves may be formed of an elastomeric material that can be deflected into the reaction flow channel by the application of pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

Filters may be designed to filter based on size and may function similarly to valves except that the filters only partially block a reaction or bridge flow channel when pressure is applied

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS11406980B2Reaction circuit design in microfluidic circuits
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 THE BROAD INST INC
  • US11406980B2 patent drawing
  • US11406980B2 patent drawing
  • US11406980B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The microfluidic devices and systems disclosed herein reduce sample loss and help decrease sample processing bottlenecks for applications such as next generation sequencing (NGS). The microfluidic devices include a plurality of reaction modules. Each reaction module may comprise one or more reaction circuits. Each reaction circuit may comprise a single reaction flow channel with each reaction circuit connected by a bridge flow channel. Alternatively, each reaction circuit may comprise two or more reaction flow channels connected by two or more bridge flow channels. The combination of any two bridge flow channels and a portion of the two or more reaction flow channels between the any two bridge flow channels defining may define the reaction circuit. The reaction module may be arranged as nodes connected by bridge flow channels or each reaction module may be arranged in a parallel fashion on the microfluidic device.