Microfluidic Device Segmentation for Combinatorial PCR Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current microfluidic systems for combining multiple reagents in laboratory experiments, such as PCR, are complex, costly, and time-consuming, particularly for combinatorial analysis and digital PCR, where multiple permutations of DNA samples and primers need to be tested efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A microfluidic device with layered structures and a separating material that allows for fluid separation and communication between cavities, enabling efficient filling, isolation, and mixing of reagents through compression and thermal manipulation, facilitating multiple combinations of reagents in a cost-effective and quick manner.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional microfluidic systems are used for combinatorial PCR analysis, then multiple reagent combinations can be achieved, but the device complexity and manufacturing cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombinatorial analysis capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into multiple independent reaction chambers (e.g., 5x5=25 chambers) that can be individually filled with different reagent combinations. Each chamber acts as an independent unit, allowing combinatorial analysis without requiring a single complex integrated system. This segmentation enables versatile reagent combination testing while maintaining simple individual chamber designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional single-well or linear array formats to a two-dimensional grid array of reaction chambers. This dimensional change allows for systematic combinatorial analysis (e.g., 5 samples x 5 primers = 25 reactions) in a compact footprint, increasing adaptability without proportionally increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual or robotic pipetting is used for reagent combination, then flexibility in reagent selection is maintained, but time consumption and operational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereagent selection flexibilityVSAvoidtime per reaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Reagents are pre-loaded into reservoirs and microfluidic channels before the experiment begins. The device automatically distributes these pre-positioned reagents to reaction chambers through controlled fluid flow, eliminating the need for real-time manual or robotic pipetting during the experiment. This preliminary preparation maintains reagent selection flexibility while dramatically reducing operational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The microfluidic system performs automatic reagent distribution and chamber filling without external intervention. Once initialized, the device self-regulates fluid flow to deliver appropriate reagent combinations to each chamber, replacing time-consuming manual operations with autonomous fluid handling while preserving experimental flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If existing digital PCR systems are employed, then aliquot division and amplification accuracy are improved, but manufacturing cost and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDNA concentration measurement accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The device automatically divides the DNA sample into multiple discrete reaction chambers, each containing a unique aliquot. This physical segmentation enables digital PCR analysis with high measurement precision while using simple, low-cost manufacturing techniques for each individual chamber, avoiding the need for expensive specialized digital PCR instrumentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The microfluidic device appears designed as a disposable or single-use platform, where each reaction chamber array can be manufactured at low cost and then discarded after one experiment. This approach trades the durability of expensive reusable systems for extremely low per-use manufacturing costs, making high-precision digital PCR accessible without significant capital investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device simplifies the process of combining reagents, reduces costs per reaction, and allows for precise control over fluid isolation and mixing, enhancing the efficiency of combinatorial and high-throughput chemical/biological reactions.

Implementation Method 1

compression of the first and second layers relative to one another causes sealing of the first channel and the second channel resulting in obstruction of the first cavity and the second cavity from further fluid entry

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

manipulation of the at least one separating material causes removal of the fluid separation allowing for fluid communication between the first cavity and second cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9163277B2Microfluidic device
Publication Date: 2015.10.20 QIAGEN SCIENCES LLC
  • US9163277B2 patent drawing
  • US9163277B2 patent drawing
  • US9163277B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Microfluidic devices of the present disclosure relate to quick and inexpensive microfluidic manipulation/handling. A number of channels may be provided for supply of fluid ingredients to a number of cavities. A separating material may provide fluid separation between a number of cavities, such as corresponding cavities of a reaction chamber. Once the cavities are supplied with fluid ingredient, channels connecting the cavities may be sealed off; that is, the cavities may be subject to fluid isolation. In some embodiments, a sealing material may be compressed so as to deform into the channels obstructing fluid flow. The separating material may be manipulated so that the initial fluid separation between cavities is removed. Removal of this fluid separation subsequently permits mixing of fluid ingredient(s) contained within previously separated cavities. In some embodiments, the fluid separation may be removed by heating or dissolving portions of the separating material. When appropriate, contents within reaction chambers may be subject to further processing (e.g., thermal cycling, various analyzes).