Microfluidic Chip With Spatially Separated Actuator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional microfluidic systems face challenges in designing actuators for microfluidic components like micropumps and microvalves due to the large size of actuators, which can complicate chip design and require direct integration, limiting flexibility and increasing costs, especially in biotechnological and medical applications where components are often disposable.

Innovation Solution

A microfluidic component design featuring a first and second substrate with a third elastic substrate in between, forming control chambers and channels, where the actuator system is spatially separated from the fluid handling area, allowing for a deformable side wall to increase pressure and activate the component, enabling loose connection and reuse of the actuator system across different microfluidic chips.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If actuators are directly integrated into the microfluidic chip, then the microfluidic component can be activated, but the chip design becomes complicated and the actuator size becomes a constraint

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrofluidic component activationVSAvoidchip design
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into two separate parts: the microfluidic chip containing control chambers and channels, and the actuator system positioned externally. The elastic substrate with control chambers is separated from the actuator, allowing independent optimization of each component without integration constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A control fluid serves as an intermediary between the actuator and the microfluidic component. The actuator compresses the elastic substrate to increase control fluid pressure, which then transmits force through the control channel to activate the microfluidic component, eliminating the need for direct mechanical coupling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If actuators are directly integrated into the microfluidic chip, then activation is achieved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrofluidic component activationVSAvoidchip manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is segmented into chip fabrication and actuator assembly as separate steps. The microfluidic chip can be manufactured using standard techniques without requiring integration of large actuators, simplifying the manufacturing process while maintaining activation functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator system is extracted from the chip structure and positioned externally. This allows the chip to be manufactured independently with simpler processes, while the actuator can be added separately, reducing overall manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If actuators are directly integrated into the microfluidic chip, then activation is achieved, but the actuator system cannot be reused across different chips

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrofluidic component activationVSAvoidactuator system reuse
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into a disposable microfluidic chip and a reusable actuator system. The chip containing the elastic substrate and control chambers can be manufactured in large quantities at low cost, while the expensive actuator system can be shared across multiple chips, enabling reuse and reducing overall system cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The microfluidic chip is designed as a disposable component that can be manufactured cheaply in large quantities. The expensive actuator system is separated and can be reused with multiple chips, while the chip itself is replaced rather than serviced, optimizing the balance between component cost and reusability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Device complexity

If control chambers and fluid channels are combined in the same area, then integration is achieved, but separation of control and fluid handling becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem integrationVSAvoidcontrol and fluid channel separation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The control chamber area and fluid channel area are segmented into spatially separated regions on the chip. The control chamber is positioned in one area where the actuator can compress the elastic substrate, while the fluid channels are positioned in a separate area, allowing independent design and manufacturing optimization for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A control fluid acts as an intermediary that connects the separated control chamber and fluid channel areas. The control fluid transmits pressure changes from the control chamber through the control channel to the fluid handling area, enabling functional connection despite spatial separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the separation of control and fluid channels, allows for standardized actuator positioning, reduces manufacturing complexity, and enables a reusable actuator system that can be universally applied across different microfluidic chips, lowering costs and improving chip design flexibility.

Implementation Method 1

the area of the third, elastic substrate arranged between the fluid channel or the fluid chamber and the first control chamber can expand into the chamber with the lower pressure at different pressures in the chambers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

By deforming this side wall, the internal volume of the second control chamber can be reduced and in this way the pressure in the closed system and thus also in the first control chamber can be increased

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP2531760B1Micro-fluidic component for manipulating a fluid, and microfluidic chip
Publication Date: 2015.07.15 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP2531760B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2531760B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2531760B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The invention relates to a micro-fluidic component for manipulating a fluid, having a first substrate (1), a second substrate (2) and a third substrate (3), which is designed from a resilient material, arranged between the first substrate (1) and the second substrate (2). At least one first recess (4) that forms a first control chamber (4') is designed on the face of the first substrate (1) facing the third substrate (3). At least one second recess (5a; 5b) that forms a fluid channel or a fluid chamber (5a'; 5b') for the fluid to be manipulated and at least in some areas overlaps with the first control chamber (4') is designed on the face of the second substrate (2) facing the third substrate (3). A second control chamber (8'), which is spatially separated from the first control chamber (4'), and a control channel (9'), which connects the first control chamber (4') to the second control chamber (8'), are formed in the first substrate (1). The control chambers (4', 8') and the control channel (9') are filled with a control fluid and at least one lateral wall of the second control chamber (8') is designed from resilient material and is deformable by means of an actuator such that the inner volume of the second control chamber (8') decreases.