Microfluidic Sensor Array Screening for Nonspecific Binding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing microfluidic devices face challenges in efficiently and cost-effectively analyzing low molecular weight pharmaceutical active agents due to high costs, lengthy analysis times, and low success rates, particularly in screening for nonspecific binding and contamination issues during multiplexed analyses.

Innovation Solution

A method for operating a microfluidic device that involves addressing a first selection of sensor spots for interaction with sample substances, changing operation based on optical sensing, and analyzing a second selection of sensor spots to exclude nonspecific interactions, allowing for efficient screening and detailed kinetic and affinity studies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single application of active agent is used on several sensor surfaces for preselection and screening, then the process is simplified and faster, but measurement data from sensor surfaces contaminated by nonspecific binding become useless and require long washing/rinsing phases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening throughputVSAvoidmeasurement data quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor array is divided into distinct functional zones: preselection sensor surfaces for initial screening and analytically functionalized sensor surfaces for detailed analysis. This segmentation allows independent evaluation of each zone, preventing contamination of analytical data by nonspecific binding events in the preselection zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The preselection measurement function is extracted and isolated from the analytical measurement function. By using separate sensor surfaces for preselection screening versus detailed kinetic/affinity analysis, the patent eliminates cross-contamination between these two measurement objectives, allowing each to be optimized independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Loss of information

If analytically functionalized sensor surfaces are used for all compounds in preselection, then binding information is obtained, but nonspecific binding contaminates the surfaces and prevents further use or requires long washing phases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding information retentionVSAvoidwashing/rinsing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Different sensor surfaces within the array are assigned different functional qualities: some surfaces are optimized for preselection screening (tolerant of nonspecific binding), while others are analytically functionalized for specific binding measurements. This local differentiation allows each surface type to perform its specific function without being compromised by the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Sensor surfaces that exhibit nonspecific binding during preselection are identified and excluded from further analytical use. The system automatically discards contaminated surfaces and redirects analysis to clean, analytically functionalized surfaces that have not been exposed to nonspecifically binding compounds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Measurement precision

If complete sensor arrays are addressed for every sample substance, then comprehensive analysis is performed, but analysis time and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis comprehensivenessVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

A preselection measurement step is performed before detailed analytical measurement. This preliminary action screens compounds for nonsspecific binding behavior, allowing the system to identify and exclude problematic compounds before committing resources to comprehensive analytical analysis, thereby reducing overall analysis time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial analysis on complete sensor arrays during preselection, addressing only the necessary subset of measurements needed to identify nonspecific binding. Full comprehensive analysis is then performed only on compounds that pass the preselection filter, avoiding redundant measurements on compounds that will be excluded anyway.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces analysis time, minimizes contamination, and enhances the efficiency of microfluidic device operations by excluding nonspecifically binding substances, thereby improving the accuracy and speed of pharmaceutical screening.

Implementation Method 1

microfluidic device which can be used to carry out multiplexed analyses of this kind, and which can be operated in a process known as 'hydrodynamic isolation', where highly discrete and small fluid volumes are applied at separate locations on sensor surfaces of the device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic isolation:

Implementation Method 2

Real time-label free (RT-LF) analysis with detection of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) has proven to be a powerful tool for biophysical characterization

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface plasmon resonance:

Data Source

PatentUS12350661B2Operation of a microfluidic device in the analysis of sample substances
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 BRUKER DALTONIK GMBH & CO KG
  • US12350661B2 patent drawing
  • US12350661B2 patent drawing
  • US12350661B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to methods for operating a microfluidic device in the analysis of sample substances, comprising: (i) providing the microfluidic device, which contains an array of separate sensor spots; (ii) addressing a first selection of the sensor spots with sample substances taken up in fluid, said first selection not comprising the whole array of sensor spots; (iii) optically sensing of the first selection of sensor spots for an interaction with the sample substances; (iv) changing the operation of the microfluidic device in response to the optically sensed interaction, by addressing a second selection of the sensor spots with the sample substances taken up in fluid, said second selection not being identical to the first selection, and (v) analyzing the sample substances by optical sensing of a third selection of sensor spots which is part of the second selection. The invention likewise relates to a corresponding arrangement with microfluidic device.