Microfluidic Device Sequential Flow Negative Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for sample processing, such as diagnosis of pathogens or disease markers, require manual labor and large, costly automated systems, leading to inefficiencies and high dependency on workers for processes like mixing, reaction, and washing.

Innovation Solution

A microfluidic device with a main flow path and multiple reservoirs that utilize negative pressure to initiate sequential fluid flow, featuring a blocking element to prevent external air from entering and controlling flow resistance, allowing for automated sample processing without pumps or valves.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual work using small vials and pipettes is used for sample processing, then flexibility and simplicity are maintained, but productivity is low and there is high dependency on workers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample processing efficiencyVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The microfluidic device enables self-service automation where the system automatically controls fluid flow, mixing, reaction, and washing processes through integrated microchannels and reservoirs, eliminating the need for manual pipetting while maintaining process flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple sample processing functions (mixing, reaction, washing, separation) are merged into a single integrated microfluidic device, combining what were previously separate manual operations into one automated system that improves productivity without requiring complex external equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If robot-type large devices are used for automated sample processing, then productivity and automation are improved, but device complexity, cost, and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample processing efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and integrates only the essential sample processing functions into a compact microfluidic chip, removing unnecessary complexity from traditional robotic systems while maintaining automated productivity through simplified microscale fluid handling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from macroscale robotic manipulation to microscale fluid flow within integrated channels, using a different dimensional approach (microfluidics rather than macro-robotics) to achieve automation with reduced device complexity and footprint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If complex pump and valve systems are applied for fluid control, then fluid flow control is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid flow controlVSAvoidpump and valve system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device uses pneumatic pressure control through a single inlet to drive fluid flow through microchannels, replacing complex mechanical pumps and valves with a simplified pressure-based fluid control system that maintains ease of operation while reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional mechanical pumps and valves are replaced with a pneumatic control system that uses pressure differentials to control fluid flow, substituting complex mechanical components with a simpler pressure-based control mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient, automated sample processing in a single device, reducing manpower, time, and space requirements, facilitating diagnosis at various sites with minimized costs.

Implementation Method 1

a suction port for sucking the fluid with a negative pressure is formed at one end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative pressure: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

a suction port for sucking the fluid with a negative pressure is formed at one end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Implementation Method 3

a blocking element that blocks the inflow of external air to the main flow path through the outlet when all the fluid in the reservoir flows out

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBlocking: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentUS20230065652A1Microfluidic device being capable of initiating sequential flow from multiple reservoirs
Publication Date: 2023.03.02 KOREA INST OF MACHINERY & MATERIALS
  • US20230065652A1 patent drawing
  • US20230065652A1 patent drawing
  • US20230065652A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The microfluidic device capable of initiating sequential flow according to the present invention includes: a main flow path in which a suction port for sucking the fluid with a negative pressure is formed at one end; a plurality of reservoirs that supply a fluid stored therein to the main flow path through an outlet by the negative pressure applied to the suction port, and are connected to a plurality of different points of the main flow path; and a blocking element that blocks the inflow of external air to the main flow path through the outlet when all the fluid in the reservoir flows out, wherein the fluid stored in a plurality of the reservoirs may flow sequentially.