Microfluidic Sperm Isolation Using Rheotaxis for DNA Integrity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sperm cell selection methods, such as those used in Artificial Reproductive Techniques (ARTs), are inefficient and can lead to DNA fragmentation and low throughput, failing to replicate the natural selection process of sperm cells due to reliance on manual and time-consuming protocols like WHO's CASA, DGC, and swim-up methods, which do not consider the microenvironment of the female reproductive tract.

Innovation Solution

A microfluidic device that mimics the natural selection process by incorporating rheotaxis and thermotaxis mechanisms, using a support plate with a basin and channel system to create a hydrostatic pressure difference and temperature gradient, facilitating high-throughput selection of high-quality sperm cells.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual protocols like WHO's CASA, DGC, and swim-up methods are used for sperm cell selection, then the selection process can be performed with simple equipment, but the throughput is low and the process is time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput of sperm cell selectionVSAvoidtime required for sperm cell selection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical protocols (CASA, DGC, swim-up) with an automated microfluidic system that uses integrated heating elements and pressure control to automatically guide sperm cells through selection channels, eliminating manual intervention and significantly increasing throughput while reducing processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the selection environment by implementing controlled temperature gradients (37°C at inlet, 39°C at outlet) and hydrostatic pressure differences within the microfluidic device, creating optimal conditions for sperm cell migration and selection that replicate natural physiological conditions while enabling high-throughput processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If standard sperm wash and density gradient centrifugation are used, then sperm cells can be separated from seminal plasma, but DNA fragmentation occurs in the separated spermatozoa

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation of sperm cells from seminal plasmaVSAvoidDNA fragmentation in spermatozoa
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces centrifugation-based separation methods with a microfluidic system that uses flow dynamics, temperature gradients, and rheotaxis to separate sperm cells from seminal plasma, achieving effective separation without the mechanical stress and DNA fragmentation caused by centrifugal forces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses hydrostatic pressure control and fluid flow dynamics within the microfluidic channels to transport and separate sperm cells, replacing the harmful centrifugal mechanical forces with gentle hydraulic flow that maintains sperm cell integrity and prevents DNA fragmentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

3Extent of automation

If CASA systems are used for automated screening, then rapid and automated screening can be achieved, but the accuracy and reproducibility are questioned and the biological significance is unknown

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated screening of sperm cellsVSAvoidaccuracy and reproducibility of sperm analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the analysis parameters by implementing temperature gradients (37°C to 39°C) and hydrostatic pressure control that replicate natural physiological conditions, allowing sperm cells to exhibit their natural motility and navigation behaviors, thereby improving the biological significance and accuracy of the automated screening results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a microenvironment within the device that copies and replicates the natural female reproductive tract conditions (temperature gradients, fluid flow patterns, rheotaxis), allowing sperm cells to behave as they would in vivo, thus improving measurement precision and biological relevance of the automated analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If conventional sperm selection methods are used, then the process can be performed with simple equipment, but the quality of selected sperm cells is compromised and DNA integrity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of selected sperm cellsVSAvoidcomplexity of selection system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses integrated microfluidic pressure control systems to create hydrostatic pressure differences that drive sperm cell migration through selection channels, enabling high-quality sperm selection with maintained DNA integrity while keeping the device structure integrated and relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements controlled temperature gradients (37°C at inlet, 39°C at outlet) within the microfluidic device to enhance sperm cell motility and navigation capabilities, improving the quality and DNA integrity of selected sperm cells through physiological parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device achieves high throughput (˜5×10^6/ml) collection of sperm cells with ˜100% motility and ˜100% DNA integration, surpassing existing systems by ensuring quality sperm cell recovery without compromising integrity.

Implementation Method 1

the inlet and the outlet are arranged to provide a hydrostatic pressure difference between said inlet zone and said outlet zone when medium is added to the basin via the outlet, so as to provoke a stream of said medium from the outlet zone towards the inlet zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrostatic pressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

the channel having a zone of reduced width arranged between the inlet zone and the outlet zone in order to form a rheotaxis zone, whereby said sample of sperm cells undergoes a selection by passing through said rheotaxis zone during said sperm cell migration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRheotaxis:

Data Source

PatentUS20250367664A1Device for sperm cell isolation and method for selection of high quality sperm cells
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 BÉEZ BIOTECH
  • US20250367664A1 patent drawing
  • US20250367664A1 patent drawing
  • US20250367664A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for sperm cell selection has a support plate comprising an inlet to receive a sample of sperm cells, an outlet to collect at least some of the sperm cells comprised in the sample, and a microfluidic system therebetween. The microfluidic system comprises a basin receiving a medium and having inlet and outlet zones. The inlet and outlet provide a hydrostatic pressure difference between the zones when medium is added to the basin via the outlet, to provoke a stream of the medium from the outlet zone towards the inlet zone to initiate sperm cell migration from the inlet zone towards the outlet zone. The basin has a zone of reduced width between the zones, to form a rheotaxis zone. The sample of sperm cells undergoes a selection by passing through the rheotaxis zone during migration for collecting quality sperm cells from the outlet zone at the outlet.